Don't speak out against this administration.

If a Republican is investigated - Proves Democrats are corrupt!

 

Don’t think they are connected. So many moving parts prior to a raid - the investigation, gathering of evidence, examining documents, seeking a search warrant that I find it hard to believe the FBI was coordinating this with policy people in the WH. Don’t believe FBI would sit on a warrant so potentially explosive as word of its existence would leak out and evidence might disappear.

If Adams accepted foreign money he should suffer the consequences.

 

Adams is being singled out because he is the only one criticizing tne federal govt?

 

Not to be dismissive, but no, it isn’t interesting to me, and no it doesn’t seem too coincidental to me. The facts and merits of the case are what is interesting to me.

 

So the point of the original post is that Biden has weaponized the FBI and DOJ against Eric Adams chief fundraiser because Adams has criticized the Biden administration? It just might be that she engaged in corrupt fundraising by illegally soliciting contributions from foreign (Turkish) sources and concealing them by arranging for the funds to be channeled through Turkish Americans. At least the OP has a bizarre consistency, Biden hasn't just weaponized the FBI and the DOJ against Trump he has also weaponized the agency against members of his own party who have criticized him.

 

and that's not all! If he can do it to them he can do it to you too! Tune in to ( insert rw outlet here) for all the deets!

 

So let me get this straight. The FBI has been investigating a democrat and raided a democratic operatives house, and somehow the timing is odd and as others have implied, it's a weaponization of the executive branch?

 

I’m sure there’s some crazy person out there who is. And both sides have their share.

The vast majority of Republicans aren’t threatening civil war.

 

You weren't so skeptical of stop the steal claims. Suggests to me that your skepticism is at best, inconsistent.

 

Not only that, but the few times a bad actor on Team Trump was taken down, Trump pardoned them, and I don't recall the skepticism there, either ... but yeah, this guy is a legit skeptic ... lol.

 

Selective skepticism?

 

Bipartisan skepticism can be good provided it acknowledges facts with a different weight than rumors and accusations.

Heavily partisan gotcha skepticism that relies on lack of full disclosure of the facts, not so much.

 

Not to toot my own horn, but while I am partisan in beliefs, I think I am fairly balanced on my B.S. meter.

 

I don't have a problem with @Gatoragman being skeptical per se but I'm not so sure why the timing would make anyone skeptical? Seems no there there. The op msn article mentioned that two operatives in NYC pleaded guilty this summer in NYC after Bragg brought charges, and it's not as if local criminal cases never then have the feds sniffing around, or that local/state and federal investigations don't ever overlap when alleged criminality comes to their attention.

 

Maybe I'm being dense, but I am just not getting the timing aspect of it as a significant issue.