Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

DOJ looking at options for homeless, mentally ill

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by rivergator, Apr 27, 2025 at 5:52 PM.

  1. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    36,827
    1,941
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    Appears to be just asking questions and there's certainly nothing wrong with that. It's not something I pretend to have an answer for. I don't think anyone likes to see the homeless camps, particularly in places that the public frequents. On the other hand, locking them up ...

    Justice Dept. examines homeless encampments, options for the mentally ill
    Officials who oversee grants were asked for ideas on clearing homeless encampments and increasing involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/04/26/homelessness-justice-department-trump/
     
  2. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    10,011
    2,283
    3,263
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Other countries have done a pretty good job with these problems. We have no desire to actually solve it
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    36,827
    1,941
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    valid point. i'd be curious how.
     
  4. tigator2019

    tigator2019 GC Hall of Fame

    1,564
    2,594
    1,873
    Dec 25, 2018
    In my head--- UF
    So house them. Feed them. clothe them.

    Just in jail.

    $42k a year.
     
  5. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    10,011
    2,283
    3,263
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    The Norwegian countries essentially treat homeless people/mentally ill as a temporary solvable problem.
     
  6. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    9,983
    1,291
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    This is a HHS and HUD issue, not DOJ. Looking at it from a criminal POV is ridiculous.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    9,724
    1,021
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Walmart FEMA camps.
     
  8. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    10,011
    2,283
    3,263
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    We're not allowed to reference certain historical events on this board anymore. But if we were allowed to reference them I'd hypothetically point out that they came for the mentally ill first.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  9. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    129,537
    60,051
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    this is a tough issue- some of them may be mentally ill- some of them seem to like living on the street and some if them it is just hard times
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,964
    300
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    I think it maybe a DoJ issue these days because homeless people cannot be forced to go to shelters or other publicly provided facilities. While in certain states, people can be involuntarily committed to mental facilities for certain things.

    I wonder if the DoJ is trying to figure out a new policy that would allow them to make a determination that if someone is addicted to drugs, they could be considered a danger to themselves, which would allow them to be involuntarily committed. This would require an expansion of faculties required to treat these people. I would assume that this is mainly aimed at DC, since it falls under the preview of Congress and has a lot of homeless encampments.
     
  11. ncargat1

    ncargat1 GC Hall of Fame

    14,783
    6,396
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    More obfuscation. This is being studied by the Justice Department because the scumbags runnig the country and their zombie supporters do not want to solve anything. They want the homeless and mentally challenged to disappear. Guessing their "solution" involves rounding up mass groups, forcing them into "camps" and providing "showers" for them all.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2025 at 10:46 PM
  12. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    4,081
    867
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    These are state and local issues, not Federal. Now, if certain states put their homeless on a bus or plane and ship them to another state, the Federal government should step in.

    Why didn’t that no good cop just leave John Rambo alone?
     
  13. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    11,595
    1,541
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    [​IMG]
     
  14. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    35,846
    12,618
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    nope, cheaper in a tropical paradise

    once we take cuba, we can warehouse them cheap there
     
  15. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,466
    1,806
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I don’t know what they are proposing but what we are or aren’t doing is disgraceful. In terms of these encampments my understanding is most of the people are mentally ill and/or addicted to drugs. Just leaving them there doesn’t help them or anybody else. I’d prefer to see them get addiction or mental health treatment, whichever is appropriate but even jail is likely better for addicts.
     
  16. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    9,724
    1,021
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    To do anything costs $$$. You have to hire mental health professionals. Whether employed by the state as a case worker, or paying a private facility for institutionalizing a severely ill person. The same goes for drug addicts or just people who need general temp shelter. Nothing is free. To pay professionals requires $$$$.

    Hiring the people should be a no brainer, except this admin won’t do that or would do the opposite. The facilities, even in the unlikely event the many billions were put forth, also have a huge NIMBY effect. It should obviously be a local thing, city by city and town by town. But let’s face it - NOBODY wants a mental health or drug rehab facility built next door so it’s hard to locate those things where they are most needed even if there was a big push to do federal grants to help build rehab centers (which is not something anyone should expect here anyway).
     
  17. Orange_and_Bluke

    Orange_and_Bluke Premium Member

    11,156
    2,737
    3,288
    Dec 16, 2015
    Rambo needed to work on his manners.
    But in his defense, Rambo only killed one person and that was inadvertent.
     
  18. citygator

    citygator GC Hall of Fame

    13,891
    2,868
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Justice department should have zero role in this. Should be a healthcare issue. Not a law enforcement one. Concentration camps of mental health victims and drug abusers doest sound so good. Treatment facilities, maybe. It really is a tough balance of individual rights and healthcare.. the DOJ is unequipped for that balance.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,964
    300
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    The issue is that just because someone is on drugs, does not mean that they can be forced into treatment. That is one of the major issues in homeless encampments in California. The people living in those encampments are choosing to do so because they can use drugs there legally and freely. If they try and go into a homeless shelter, they cannot take drugs into the shelter or use them in the shelter. So they prefer to live on the streets and do drugs rather than go to shelters.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,466
    1,806
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    that’s why they should go to jail if all other options are refused. I say that as a parent of a recovering addict.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Friendly Friendly x 1