Democrat blows whistle on alleged ballot harvesting scheme, Florida opens criminal probe

Newsflash: I use geofencing phone locations in my business monthly and am likely far more familiar with it than you are.

Reuters=Chinese= more conspiratorial garbage. I should have learned already that replying to you is worthless because you're so far imbedded up the conspiratorial sphincter of the nether world that its largely pointless, but I actually think you're a good guy nonetheless so i tried one more time.

Fool me once.......

 

I'm not speaking the truth about what?

 

If you're gonna say that someone isn't being honest, you should at least back up your accusation and not just post some random links.

 

Just keep scrolling

 

Hey, it was in bold font.

 

You’re the ones who won’t quit throwing shit at the wall. We are simply pointing at it and reminding you for the umpteenth time that it’s just shit.

 

D'Souza is now being sued by a guy accused of criminal acts in that idiotic movie who was just dropping off ballots for him and his family.

 

Come on Rick, you know that silly GPS thing only works for J6 whereabouts.

 

The woman has a long history of losing elections. Looks like sour grapes to me.
Cynthia Harris-Ballotpedia

 

As a Dem, EVERY pro-Dem yard sign I've put up here in Fort Myers has been promptly stolen. And my car once had a sticky substance thrown on it because it had a Dem bumper sticker. Typical despicable right-wing anti-democracy dirty tricks.

So, your observation means nothing. Probably 25 years of signs being stolen.

 

If you don’t think Reuters can be trusted because it simply resides in a country with a liberal president, why would you trust any of the sites you are linking, which have clear ideological stances?

 

Former Trump AG Bill Barr, who is a REPUBLICAN, thinks its fiction. When testifying under oath, AG Barr mocked this propaganda film.

Bill Barr's testimony regarding "2,000 Mules" . . .

 

Serious students of that film's accusations: Here are 20 documented reasons with detailed explanations why these charges aren't true.

Defenders of the film's accusations: The deniers are wrong! It's definitely true because I said so!

 

It's not. But even if it is, that would be better than a shameless conspiracy propagandist who that cannot deal in a fact based reality.

 

Perhaps, but what I am asking is how can we know this? What do we need to identify a bad source? Why is being in Canada fatal to a source’s credibility, but being in Texas not an obstacle to trustworthiness?