Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Gator Country Black Friday special!

    Now's a great time to join or renew and get $20 off your annual VIP subscription! LIMITED QUANTITIES -- for details click here.

Coronavirus - International stories and thoughts

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8trGr8t, Jan 20, 2020.

  1. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,289
    5,285
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    I posted in the Trump is outing project back to work thread a college study there that showed that 250,000 people would die under that plan. So they shifted gears. It is a short thread. Forgive me for not linking it. Again
     
  2. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,289
    5,285
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    . The study is linked here.
     
  3. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,864
    870
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
  4. 14serenoa

    14serenoa Living in Orange and surrounded by Seminoles... VIP Member

    4,757
    1,693
    2,088
    Jul 28, 2014
    hence, they are working to develop a vaccine as quickly as possible...I believe Fauci suggested 12-18 months to develop a vaccine.
     
  5. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,589
    2,835
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Your point is about the validity of Chinese contribution, etc. I believe you are saying it’s overblown. Fair enough. But no matter how minimal, it vastly exceeds the contribution of the United States. By design. As currently governed, we have stated that we dot wish to be a world leader. And no one looking at our current leadership would expect it.

    The point is not the extent of Chinese leadership. The point is that we exhibit none. Just the opposite. It’s plain we are led by a minimally functioning evil idiot.

    We have said we don’t care. He has said that relationships between nations are for suckers, that we were being exploited. This is the result
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,589
    2,835
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Obviously way to early to draw any conclusions
     
  7. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise GC Hall of Fame

    15,716
    26,020
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. exiledgator

    exiledgator Gruntled

    11,115
    1,952
    3,128
    Jan 5, 2010
    Maine
    Self reply.

    So, this is promising. Italy sees it's first significant two-day decline. Weird that deaths and cases are lockstep. I would think deaths would lag. Anyway:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    I'm glad we didn't see a continuation of the sine wave growth.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  9. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,730
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Great news, that means our early states should also start showing a decline in the next few days, and most of the rest of us in 10-14 days.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  10. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,864
    870
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Italy went on lockdown basically between March 4th and 8th. So it's been approximately 20 days. Based on what they say about the long incubation period, I would also have assumed the "new cases" should be coming down first (and 20 days makes 100% perfect sense for that), whereas deaths should have taken an other week or two to level off after that. But we'll take that extra bit of good news where we can get it. :) Hopefully this trend holds up.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  11. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    23,102
    5,731
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    Italy spiked back up in deaths and cases, 743 deaths today. Didn’t Quite hit their max from the other day though.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  12. exiledgator

    exiledgator Gruntled

    11,115
    1,952
    3,128
    Jan 5, 2010
    Maine
    That's a bummer.

    It's hard to read trends looking at this data so granularly (daily). Maybe we see a decreasing sine wave going forward.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise GC Hall of Fame

    15,716
    26,020
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    • Informative Informative x 1
  14. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    23,102
    5,731
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise GC Hall of Fame

    15,716
    26,020
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
  16. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    13,642
    1,917
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    I looked at the mathematics on this, and it appears the good professor made a couple of mistakes. It appears that his formula is to take the number of people who are infected by one person, and raise it to the power of the number of "cycles". Three raised to the tenth power does equal about 59,000. However, 1.4 raised to the tenth power equals 29, not 14. And if the coronavirus is 3 times more infectious, each person should infect an average of 4.2 people (3 x 1.4), not 3 people. And 4.2 raised to the tenth power is a much larger 1.7 million people.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  17. obgator

    obgator GC Hall of Fame

    1,803
    1,346
    2,103
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  18. HallGator

    HallGator Senile Administrator

    49,756
    1,802
    2,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    Outer Limits
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  19. RIP

    RIP I like touchdowns Premium Member

    6,952
    1,981
    3,313
    Feb 2, 2015
    • Agree Agree x 2
  20. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    11,704
    2,576
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Canada has this thing licked.