Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

I don't see you calling out the CDC with the same vigor. Weird...

 

He 100% excluded information and falsified data to make him and his loon governor look better. There are myriad of articles pointing to this exact issue. You just can’t admit to being duped, sad.

 

Speaking of being duped …

 

He analyzed the data and was actually able to make the correct decision. Unlike the propagandists that kept pushing policy that was the antithesis of medicine. Thank goodness we got and have a competent Doctor leading the Public Health of Florida.

 

From 2020 we’ve gotten healthcare good and hard.

April Was the Cruelest Month

 

You’re right, the MD with a history of sketchy practices and manipulating data, as well as being associated with a well known grifting scheme, is correct and everyone else in the medical and science industry is incorrect, lol. It’s clear that no matter how much proof you see, you’ll just continue to stick your head in the sand. Sad.

 

It is absolutely clear that you are still part of the probably 10% now that have either fallen so bad for the propaganda that you still can’t see reality. Or are too ashamed to admit how wrong you were.

Ladapo got it right by practicing Medicine and providing guidance the way one is supposed to as a doctor and public health official.

He got it right. Don’t worry though. You can go keep taking your shots. No seroprevalence needed to be considered. No clinical trials needed to be considered. The cdc and fda got you! And Pfizer and Moderna’s backs!

You have been well trained not to question and follow the one size fits all approach. The antithesis of medicine and science for that matter.

 

[QUOTE="QGator2414, post: 15030041, member: 14534"
Ladapo got it right by practicing Medicine and providing guidance the way one is supposed to as a doctor and public health official.
[/QUOTE]

I want to make sure I'm understanding you correctly, you believe that ignoring data that doesn't support the desired conclusion is the right way for doctors and public health officials to practice medicine and provide guidance?

 

I want to make sure I'm understanding you correctly, you believe that ignoring data that doesn't support the desired conclusion is the right way for doctors and public health officials to practice medicine and provide guidance?[/QUOTE]
The only data that is being devoutly ignored, in greater or lesser amounts, is the SCIENTIFIC FACT that a virus was never isolated that we had to vaccinate for. Lapado ranks as a lesser offender than his critics.

 

I want to make sure I'm understanding you correctly, you believe that ignoring data that doesn't support the desired conclusion is the right way for doctors and public health officials to practice medicine and provide guidance?[/QUOTE]

Who said he ignored the data? He looked at the whole. Even Offit no longer pushes these shots on kids. Ladapo was ahead of the curve. So he found the data that young people should not take the shots more compelling that they should based on risk. And he was right.

 

Viruses have been isolated. Only those who don't understand virology make silly claims to the contrary.

As for Ladapo, he ignored verified, scientifically reviewed data that didn't support his conclusion, and cherrypicked only a small subset of data that was later proven to be false. That's not how a good doctor and/or a good scientist works. From the article:

Last October, Ladapo cited a state analysis that found young men had an elevated risk of cardiac-related death after getting the shot. Documents obtained by the Tampa Bay Times show the state also had data that found the risk was much higher after COVID infection, which was not in Ladapo's final report.​

 

Q probably uses the toothpaste that 1 out 10 dentists recommend

 

Careful now. The snowflake will call you out for being a bully and mean to him even though he likes to dish it but can’t receive it back.

 

The methods from the very first study tendered, as evidence of isolation, only serve to prove Crowe’s point, which is that virologists have completely debased the concept of isolation. Translation: some of us understand virology all too well …

The patient's oropharyngeal samples were obtained by using UTM™ kit containing 1 mL of viral transport media (Copan Diagnostics Inc., Murrieta, CA, USA) on day 7 of her illness. We inoculated monolayers of Vero cells (ATCC ® CCL-81™) with the samples and cultured the cells at 37°C in a 5% carbon dioxide atmosphere. Until 5 days after inoculation, cytopathic effects were not distinct, which is compatible with the previous findings that no specific cytopathic effects were observed in the Vero E6 cells until 6 days after inoculation in the report about first isolation of SARS-CoV-2.3Five days after inoculation, we did blind passage of culture supernatant into T-25 culture flask (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with monolayers of Vero cells, and cytopathic effects consisting of rounding and detachment of cells were observed in the whole area of the T-25 flask 3 days after the first blind passage (Fig. 1A and B).

 

I thought pointing out people who are part of the 10% was fair game

 

As to ‘isolation’, to refresh …

 

We use the stuff on sale at the store. Usually Aquafresh. Colegate right now.

 

It has been posted several times in this thread, but I can post it again for you:
Florida health officials removed key data from COVID vaccine report