Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

This study compares vaccine induced myocarditis and MIS-C versus COVID induced. Rates are higher in both instances with infection. Not only does infection increase your chances of myocarditis, it increases severe outcomes which is MIS-C.

 

I’m not trying to troll you, but the fact that you didn’t know this is rather shocking and should probably cause you to reconsider where you are getting your information on such matters.

 

“The direct relationship between SARS-Cov2 and heart inflammation is tenuous at best.”

Not surprising, given that SARS-Cov2 only exists in the form of a computer printout ...

Autopsy Data Confirm Deadly Heart Inflammation From Covid Vaccines But Not From Covid Infection – The Daily Sceptic

 

I was asking for proof not arguing I have had 2 of the vaccines and now have myocarditis with NO history of any heart disease I don't smoke never have and barely drink alcohol so I am somewhat looking for validation


Higher Incidence of Myocarditis, Pericarditis Found After COVID-19 Vaccination).

 

“Safe and Effective.”

Keep saying it as many times as it takes to believe it.

 

Have you had Covid?

 

A very mild case if you want to say I tested positive for it but I was diagnosed with Myocarditis before it happened

 

Sorry to hear that. From what I understand most cases of vaccine induced myocarditis are pretty mild and fully resolve themselves in relatively short order. Covid induced myocarditis tends to be more serious on average.

 

“Covid induced myocarditis tends to be more serious on average.”

What’s Covid ?

 

Are you going to actually contribute something or just keep posting the same dumb shit over and again?

 

As long as belief in fatal unicorn dust persists, I’ll be the kid in the back with his hand raised.

 

The Covid emergency ends on May 11th and so should this thread

 

That study is complete garbage lol.

Let me pick a 4 year span to look at before Covid. Then an 11 month span during Covid (including part of the time shots were given out/granted early and very few 21 year olds would have gotten one). And a two month span (also early on when few 21 year olds would have been getting them). Which provided 9 total subjects to look at in the vaccine group lol.

What a joke. Stop looking for the answer you want. Demand RCT on myocarditis. In myocardial infraction. On Silent Myocardial Infraction.

There is no sound evidence in any direction because they are not looking for answers. But you know we have a massive increase in events.

It is going to be a combination of things. It will be Covid. It will be the shots. It will be the lockdowns. And it will be the fear instilled in people to not go to the doctor. Those 4 things are going to be the driving factors. And we need to know which ones are primary. Though it really is a combination likely.

We never should have told a young healthy person to cause inflammation in their body unnecessarily!

 

Well, someone better tell the actual scientists who are collecting actual data and analyzing it.

JACC data showing incidence of cardiac event post COVID significantly lower in those vaccinated than those not.

 

Also, I guess it is good we continue to show that anti-parasite medication does not, in fact, have any benefit against VIRAL infections. Huh...go figure.

Higher-Dose Ivermectin vs Placebo and Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With COVID-19

 

Don't like one study? Fine. Here's another. This one from Italy that supports the risk of MIS-C from infection is much greater than myocarditis from the vaccine.

Maybe you don't like the study above. So how about this one? From the study:

Myocarditis and myopericarditis are now a known rare and serious adverse event of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines.17–20 The incidence of these complications is significantly lower than that occurring after natural infection, and thus, the benefits of vaccination outweigh the known risks in this regard.
​

The questions you ask are fine. The hypothesis that it's the vaccine is worth testing too. But the data and facts that we already have? None point to the conclusion that it's the vaccine. And plenty point to infection as the cause.

You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. And those facts and data don't support your opinion one iota. No matter how indignant you get.

 

I wouldn’t even bother trying to educate him anymore, Cat. It’s clear that any response that doesn’t fit or agree with that of his expert dental receptionist opinion is wrong no matter how many facts or studies you show him. And of course he never has an actual study of his to support his claims. It’s the same dumb garbage over and over again with him. He’s a lost cause drowning in his own unfounded arrogance.

 

This thread got much, much better by simply blocking 2 people.

 

I enjoy reading the laughably ignorant comments backed up by no proof, followed by the continual laughing emoji reactions we get while trying to educate them.

 

Whereas there simply are no studies that support your claims.