Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Chinese Chip Exports and djt Taiwan Comments

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8trGr8t, Oct 11, 2022.

  1. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,636
    12,199
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Biden admin taking proactive stance to limit Chinese ability to advance their chip making capacity with restrictions on firms that agree to sell certain machinery to China. I wonder how China will react to this. It has certainly hit the chip making stocks hard today. Time to buy?

    And for all the DT bluster about China, he proposed nothing like this.

    U.S. aims to cripple China’s chip industry with massive export crackdown | Fortune

    The Biden administration expanded its export curbs to Chinese semiconductor companies on Friday, as part of its drive to stop China from developing advanced computer chips.

    Shares in Chinese chip manufacturers, like Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (SMIC), fell on Monday, as investors feared that new controls would severely hamper the operations of domestic chip firms.

    The new export controls are the broadest imposed in years. The Biden administration will bar companies that use U.S. chipmaking equipment from selling chips used in supercomputers to China, and will block the sale of an even broader array of chips to almost 30 Chinese companies, including artificial intelligence firms SenseTime and Megvii. It’s also stopping the export of advanced chipmaking equipment to Chinese-owned factories. (Companies can apply for a license to export these products to China, yet officials said most applications would be denied.)

    And more controls may be coming. Also on Friday, the Biden administration said it could not adequately inspect operations at dozens of Chinese companies, including state-owned chipmaker Yangtze Memory Technologies Corp. The U.S. carries out these inspections in order to ensure that exported equipment is not being diverted to third parties or unapproved uses. Once the U.S. Department of Commerce puts a company on its so-called unverified list, the company has 60 days to allow inspections before U.S. officials impose export controls.

    China’s foreign ministry blasted the new U.S. controls on Saturday as an attempt to preserve American “technological hegemony.”
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  2. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    5,015
    1,026
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    Good. We give away too much technology. If you can’t make shat, you aren’t.
     
  3. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,977
    890
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Bad for “free markets”, but definitely a good (and arguably necessary) national security move with the direction China has been going. China (and Taiwan) are still going to make chips, we just need to make sure there is flexible “western” capacity in case of supply disruption, and that the cutting edge is here first.

    People need to realize they can’t have it both ways. If you want a “crackdown” on China and Chinese technology theft, it means those stocks are down and some goods might get expensive as production shifts. Unfortunately we can bet the “China Joe” people who thought Biden would be weak on China will ignore all that, and of course focus on the downsides of this choice.
     
  4. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,682
    1,215
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    UK is designating China an enemy by dint of its technological advances. I’m disavowing my Anglo heritage.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. DesertGator

    DesertGator VIP Member

    4,527
    2,343
    2,013
    Apr 10, 2007
    Frisco, TX
    Ouch ... This is going to massacre the entire sector in the short term (already is actually; QRVO down 4% SWKS down 3.5%; Broadcom and others down 1-2%). Most of the chip manufacturers here in the US (except for ITAR content) have foundries in China (among other places)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. ncargat1

    ncargat1 GC Hall of Fame

    14,461
    6,326
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    People need to stop thinking about just wafer fabs. There is ZERO substrate manufacturing outside of Asia (mostly China). There is next to ZERO (by volume) passive component manufacturing outside of China (capacitors, inductors, resistors). There is almost no test or assembly capacity outside of Asia, with a large part of it in China.

    I hope everyone is happy with their current iPhone. It will be about a decade or so until there will be a new one available if China takes a swing back at the US. Also, thousands of us in the semiconductor industry will be heading for the unemployment lines shortly. Almost all of the chip consumption in the world is IN China, either for direct end use or for assmbly into devices (iPhone, your Samsung TV made in China or your Cisco Router - still made in Huawei operated plants near Guongzhou). Also, all of those Smart Cars and electric cars everyone wants - almost all of those chips come from China. Good luck.
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
  7. DesertGator

    DesertGator VIP Member

    4,527
    2,343
    2,013
    Apr 10, 2007
    Frisco, TX
    By "substrate manufacturing", you mean growing the actual EPI? If that's the case, there is a single small house in the US, but you're right that's going to be the major bottleneck. There actually is still quite a bit of component manufacture in Europe, Japan and the US and there's actually a significant amount of test and assembly outside of Asia due primarily to ITAR limitations in the aerospace and defense industry. That's more for GaAs and GaN, though I would imagine that the DoD wouldn't care if it's GaN or SOI for ITAR purposes.
     
  8. carpeveritas

    carpeveritas GC Hall of Fame

    2,529
    3,567
    1,998
    Dec 31, 2016
    Bloviating at best. How to enforce such wishes becomes the issue. Sounds good but not much meat on the bones.

    In a briefing with reporters on Thursday previewing the rules, senior government officials said many of the measures were aimed at preventing foreign firms from selling advanced chips to China or supplying Chinese firms with tools to make their own advanced chips. They conceded, however, that they had not secured any promises that allied nations would implement similar measures and that discussions with those nations are ongoing.

    "We recognize that the unilateral controls we're putting into place will lose effectiveness over time if other countries don't join us," one official said. "And we risk harming U.S. technology leadership if foreign competitors are not subject to similar controls."
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,892
    1,865
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    Sounds pretty stupid to me. trade has probably been the greatest vehicle for bringing people together in history.

    oh, & where are those dems that BLASTED Trumps' tariffs....the ones that are STILL in place????
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2022
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  10. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    13,985
    1,993
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    Don't worry. I'm guessing your Anglo heritage has disavowed you a long time ago. :)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  11. ncargat1

    ncargat1 GC Hall of Fame

    14,461
    6,326
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    Substrate, as in the multilayer boards that are laminated together that chips are attached to, so that they can connect to the outside world.

    There is almost no testing in the United States for commercial products is what I should have typed. People like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin may have tiny shops for military products where they perform their own final assembly and test, but those who supply to companies like that stopped testing in the US 20+ years ago. So, ironically, either those companies purchase un-tested die and take that risk upon themselves, or their acquired components were tested in Asia before going into their end use.

    GaN is a slightly different beast, and because we are also in that market, I probably should not discuss those specifics. They are....weird.

    Also, I do not believe that there are "quite a bit" of component manufacturing outside of Asia (note - Japan is part of Asia). There are many companies, they just do their bulk manufacturing in Asia. For example, if you look at Aerovoxx. They are an American SMD manufacturer, and they even have pilot line inside the outer loop in Massachusetts to makes SMDs. However, where is the volume production located? India (note - also part of Asia) and China. Also, the worst thing that happened to the semiconductor supply chains was the earthquake/tidal wave that struck Japan in 2011. The two largest Capacitor/Inductor manufacturing plants in the world were destroyed and the companies never rebuilt in Japan, they simply moved more production to their own China plants.

    Again, people can find small, mom-and-pop shops. The world is not capable of moving the semiconductor supply chains out of China on short notice. Further, China is a HUGE market for US semiconductor companies. If trade with China is artificially curbed for political sabre rattling reasons, a LOT of Americans will lose their jobs, and without those markets to serve, there will be no need to move jobs back to the US, because there will be far fewer end customers.
     
  12. DesertGator

    DesertGator VIP Member

    4,527
    2,343
    2,013
    Apr 10, 2007
    Frisco, TX

    Ok, now I'm tracking. My expertise ends after the chip build and test is complete. I thought you meant the semi-conductive substrate for the wafers & die. Those are primarily grown in China. When I was in the industry, we had several foundries to build die from wafers worldwide on different processes. The primary non-GaAs or non-GaN one was in Singapore and they dealt in high volume on SOI.

    My entire response was based on the build and test at the actual package device level, so I'll have to defer to your expertise once we're past the component build stage of the circuit board. As far as passive components to go into the package (caps, inds, res), we were already required to order from manufacturers outside of China for defense applications so they do exist in volumes larger than mom and pop. Commercial applications had no such requirement.

    Companies like RTN and LMCO do purchase untested die and contract domestic foundries (like QRVO and SWKS) to build and probe bare die and package products in great quantity. I do know that RTN has several package houses (including its own in MA) for those die to be shipped for package build and T/R (Tape & Reel)

    Either way, you're correct that it will put a tremendous strain on the supply chain for circuit boards and electronics.
     
  13. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,633
    2,881
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    I don’t have technical expertise to evaluate this come out but here’s China tech specialist Greg Allen trying to weigh in and explain it those of us without background

    The whole thing should be read as it goes into detail but this is a brief summary. Essentially we are attempting to exploit US dominant choke points.


    Three Key Takeaways from the Biden Administration’s Actions
    In summary, the United States does not want China to have advanced AI computing and supercomputing facilities, so it has blocked them from purchasing the best AI chips, which are all American. It does not want China designing its own AI chips, so it has blocked China from using the best chip design software (which is all American) to design high-end chips, and it has blocked chip manufacturing facilities worldwide from accepting entity-listed Chinese chip design firms (as well as any Chinese chip company building high-end chips) as customers. Finally, the United States does not want China to have its own advanced chip manufacturing facilities, so it has blocked them from purchasing the necessary equipment, much of which is irreplaceably American.
    In weaponizing its dominant chokepoint positions in the global semiconductor value chain, the United States is exercising technological and geopolitical power on an incredible scale. The targeted nature of the Biden administration’s actions here suggests three important implications about its worldview.


    Choking Off China’s AI Access


    He also points out some of the weak points on enforcement mechanisms and impact on other countries
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  14. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,682
    1,215
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    I hope so!
     
  15. carpeveritas

    carpeveritas GC Hall of Fame

    2,529
    3,567
    1,998
    Dec 31, 2016
    I don't see how this helps anything at all. Everyone is aware of the Chinese and corporate espionage. Can someone explain to me how allowing these carve outs is going to make a difference?

    US waives export curbs for some non-Chinese chipmakers
    The United States government has allowed at least two non-Chinese chipmakers operating in China to receive restricted goods and services without their suppliers seeking licenses, easing the burden of a new crackdown on the Chinese chip sector, according to industry sources.

    The Biden administration had planned to spare foreign companies operating in China, such as South Korean memory chip makers SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics Co, from the brunt of new restrictions, but the rules published on Friday failed to exempt such firms, the sources said.

    South Korea’s SK Hynix on Wednesday confirmed it had received authorisation from the US Department of Commerce to receive chip equipment needed for its chip production facilities in China for one year, without seeking additional licensing requirements.

    As published, the Biden administration’s rules require licenses before US exports can be shipped to facilities with advanced chip production in China, as part of a US bid to slow Beijing’s technological and military advances.
     
  16. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    13,985
    1,993
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    I'm sure the designation has more to do with:

    a) China weaponizing the computer chips.

    b) China threatening combat with their neighbors.
     
  17. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,636
    12,199
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    US export limitations combined with djt threat to abandon Taiwan if they don't pay up shook the chip market. wipes out $500 Billion in a day. Nasdaq took a big hit on that

    I see it as a kneejerk reaction and a good entry op if someone was so inclined..ASML down 11% on an earnings and projections beat. AMD off 10% after incorporating an inhouse software team to maximize their chip performance and grow their ecosystem

    What I dont get about the export limit impact is the new Nvidia biz model I read is for them and a few US centered mega companies to host AI computing power/capacity and sell time to power to end user. If you don't sell the chip but sell the service, does it violate the export limitations?

    Chip stocks shed over $500 billion in value on China trade fears | Reuters

    Wall Street's semiconductor index lost more than $500 billion in stock market value on Wednesday in its worst session since 2020 after a report said the United States was mulling tighter curbs on exports of advanced semiconductor technology to China.

    Remarks from Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump saying key production hub Taiwan should pay the United States for its defense deepened selling in chip stocks.
    ...............................................................................
    The latest worries for chip investors come after Washington in recent years has adopted a more protective stance for the U.S. semiconductor manufacturing industry, which it views as strategically important for competing against China.

    The United States has told allies it is considering using the most severe trade curbs available if companies continue giving China access to advanced semiconductor technology, Bloomberg News reported on Tuesday.
     
  18. slayerxing

    slayerxing GC Hall of Fame

    5,013
    857
    2,078
    Aug 14, 2007
    there are venture capital organizations in the us trying to address this issue but it’s going to take a while unfortunately.