Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Bipartisan improvements to election law

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by oragator1, Jul 20, 2022.

  1. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    22,888
    5,581
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. enviroGator

    enviroGator GC Hall of Fame

    5,520
    758
    368
    Apr 12, 2007
  3. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,909
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    McConnell said a year ago he’d be willing to give this a shot, but at the time Democrats instead wanted to symbolically vote on a broader voting reform bill that had no chance of passing and even Manchin didn’t support.
     
  4. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,676
    843
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    This only (supposedly) addresses the 1/6 electoral count batshittery, and as we saw even that is potentially vulnerable if enough nut jobs are willing to coordinate to violate or ignore the law. I’m not convinced this is 100% rock solid. Although the +9 Republicans matter since it indicates the approx. # of GOP Senators who would NOT vote to end the United States.

    What we need to do is make sure it’s harder for hyper-partisan nut jobs to get elected in the 1st place. Whatever else they asked for, the dems were right to push for restoration of voting rights act and to end partisan gerrymandering once and for all. The problem is the GOP have largely built a structural advantage through gerrymandering, they won’t give that up easily.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,843
    5,781
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Because this does basically nothing to solve the real problems confronting us. We should be protecting democratic rights.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,909
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I rest my case.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,843
    5,781
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    That I care about actually solving problems instead of passing empty legislations? Yes, you've won your case. I'm not adverse to compromise. But this isn't even compromise.
     
  8. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    87,737
    26,315
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    If any state later finds out that their election has made a mistake and finds real fraud in their elections, and they decide to decertify, then Washington will have a fight to contend with in the SCOTUS...

    Elections are made and ratified at the state level. The federal leave of certification is really only a formality, and should NEVER be considered immutable.
     
  9. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    87,737
    26,315
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    What case? That other people have different opinions than you do? LMFAO!