Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Biden Restricts U.S. Investment in China

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by okeechobee, Aug 9, 2023.

  1. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    3,302
    784
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    This seems like a hard thing to do in a global economy. We want access to their market. The acquisition of land is a non issue with eminent domain and nationalization. Critical industries (food supply) makes it maybe important to have regulatory agencies like the FDA to control what China puts into the food supply.
     
  2. Contra

    Contra GC Hall of Fame

    1,372
    360
    178
    May 15, 2023
    Whataboutism.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  3. Contra

    Contra GC Hall of Fame

    1,372
    360
    178
    May 15, 2023
    Speaking to the OP, though, two major points should be underscored. First, this is a good thing. Second, the Democrats have their heads in the sand, and they are far too slow to respond to national security threats, especially as it relates to China.

    There is a parallel here to the spy balloon incident. Was it good that Biden shot it down? Yes, but the problem is how long it took Biden to get off his laurels to make that decision. The same exact thing can be said here. There is a very clear pattern of taking way too long to make decisions that should have been made long ago.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,875
    1,860
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    this makes 0 sense. by virtue of being a fortune 500 comp, they are public companies that anyone with the skrilla can own.
     
  5. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,392
    8,137
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    Land-potentially
    Fortune 500 entities-not at all.
     
  6. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,455
    1,790
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    I remember when Trump imposed tariffs on China and China responded by imposing retaliatory tariffs on US agricultural products especially soy afterwards we ended by compensating US farmers for the loss of Chinese markets by giving them billions in subsidies. How did that workout? And by the way it's US corporations and consumers that pay the tariffs not the Chinese.
    ‘Trump is ruining our markets’: Struggling farmers are losing a huge customer to the trade war — China
     
  7. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,875
    1,860
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    those tariffs are still in place. It's on Joe now.
     
  8. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,228
    461
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    Does this mean no more taxpayer funded chinese biolabs in california?
     
  9. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,836
    1,419
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Extra large xenophobe Joe.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,455
    1,790
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    While keeping the tariffs in place is still illogical economically rescinding them could be disastrous politically.
     
  11. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Trump didnt even know about the balloon invasions - he was incompetent. Nor did Trump do anything to slow China down unless Ivanka's patent deals were a trojan horse. Democrats have been steadfast supportive of Taiwan and have pushed through legislation curbing tech exports. How have the republicans been better?
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  12. Contra

    Contra GC Hall of Fame

    1,372
    360
    178
    May 15, 2023
    More whataboutism.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  13. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Dumbaboutism. I replied directly to your question about how democrats handled China vs republicans.
     
  14. Contra

    Contra GC Hall of Fame

    1,372
    360
    178
    May 15, 2023
    Responding to what I wrote with anything having to do with Trump and Republicans is whataboutism. My post did not make any comparisons between the Democrats and Republicans. It simply was a statement about Democrats and how untimely and delayed their responses are to issues relating to national security threats.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  15. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Your post was an unsupported musing.
     
  16. Contra

    Contra GC Hall of Fame

    1,372
    360
    178
    May 15, 2023
    That is a better response. We can agree to disagree.
     
  17. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Who cares. Until Dems try to overthrow our democracy you're gonna get a lot of whataboutisms.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  18. Contra

    Contra GC Hall of Fame

    1,372
    360
    178
    May 15, 2023
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  19. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    10,118
    2,474
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    Why do you think it should have been done “long ago”? Unless it’s too late, what does it matter? Personally, as long as it’s not too late - and who am I to judge whether it is in this case - I prefer careful deliberation in such matters, especially when it comes to America-China relations.
     
  20. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    We put that fire out on Jan 20 2021.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1