Biden’s or his staff’s use of an auto pen comes under scrutiny

Biden Autopen Pardons Invalid, Legal Memo Finds

 

Anyone in here gonna click on the link and see which Trumpy charlatan wrote the "legal memo"?

 

Just another MAGA that was shoved into too many lockers as a kid.



Fred Lucas is chief news correspondent and manager of the Investigative Reporting Project for The Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.”

 

This is an extremely important thing to "put to bed", and I respect people's desire to put things to bed.

I'm kind of wondering why nobody on the right cared whether there were criminal actions to overturn the 2020 presidential election - personally, I wanted to see that issue conclusively "put to bed." Somewhat important issue, no?

I guess we should look at things positively; even though Trump supporters were very comfortable with insistent upon making sure there was no inquiry into his pretty obvious un-American crimes ........... at least they've rediscovered their strong sense of justice and righteousness, and want other, less important, things "put to bed." So that's good at least.

 

This is how the right wing works today, come up with some crazy accusation then put the burden of proof on that person or thing to prove that the accuser is wrong

 

^ While flagrantly committing crimes themselves.

Fake slates of electors? Coercing state officials and the VP?

We're supposed to just pretend that that didn't happen.

They're criminals. Nothing more.

 

Im kind of rooting for this now because I've seen a lot of loans holders, especially student loans holders, say they signed their loan docs with auto pen and they'll be void.

 

Sorry bud, this only works in situations that benefit The Messiah

 

That was pertaining to the J6 riots. (And didn't include inquiry into pretty obvious criminality by Trump)

The sitting president and/or his cromies coerced state officials, tried to coerce his VP, established fake elector slates, repeatedly publicly lied about fake election fraud, defamed both individuals and companies.

The only way anyone could say that that is put to bed is if they are perfectly comfortable having pretty obvious potential criminality go uninvestigated. I guess that may include you, though - who knows.

 

I guess the courts will have to figure that out. I'll be entertained.

 

I love that the right just gets to invent stuff in bad faith and then its up the person they invent stuff about to clear it up for them in good faith, which will definitely put the issue to bed, not result in claims of "he is obviously is lying under oath and is guilty of perjury"

 

dO YoUR ReSeaRcH