Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

As Workers Battle Cancer, The Government Admits Its Limit for a Deadly Chemical Is Too High

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by philnotfil, Dec 15, 2022.

  1. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,705
    1,785
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    OSHA is supposed to be making workplaces safe, not cowering in fear from industry lawyers.

    Government Admits Its Ortho-Toluidine Exposure Limit Is Too High — ProPublica

    The permissible exposure limit for ortho-toluidine is 5 parts per million in air, a threshold based on research conducted in the 1940s and ’50s without any consideration of the chemical’s ability to cause cancer. Despite ample evidence that far lower levels can dramatically increase a person’s cancer risk, the legal limit has remained the same.

    Paralyzed by industry lawsuits from decades ago, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has all but given up on trying to set a truly protective threshold for ortho-toluidine and thousands of other chemicals. The agency has only updated standards for three chemicals in the past 25 years; each took more than a decade to complete.

    David Michaels, OSHA’s director throughout the Obama administration, told ProPublica that legal challenges had so tied his hands that he decided to put a disclaimer on the agency’s website saying the government’s limits were essentially useless: “OSHA recognizes that many of its permissible exposure limits (PELs) are outdated and inadequate for ensuring protection of worker health.” This remarkable admission of defeat remains on the official site of the U.S. agency devoted to protecting worker health.

    “To me, it was obvious,” Michaels said. “You can’t lie and say you’re offering protection when you’re not. It seemed much more effective to say, ‘Don’t follow our standards.’”
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  2. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    13,510
    1,889
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    There are just so many millions of chemicals out there (I have never even heard of this one) that it is hard for regulating agencies to keep up with all of them. And the studies take quite a long time and are expensive. Every once in a while, EPA or OSHA lowers the standard (e.g., PEL or permissible exposure limit) on a chemical with no justification whatsoever, and lowers it to a level that is impossible to measure. How do you know if you are exceeding a limit if you can't measure that low? So they err in the other direction as well.