Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Are Nukes Actually Real ?

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by duggers_dad, Mar 7, 2025.

Page 4 of 4
  1. Mar 9, 2025 #61
    Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    90,411
    27,244
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    It's because of the lack of metals in the building construction of that old city. Metals will hold the radiation. Metals unlike concrete and wood will get and stay irradiated for much longer.
     
  2. Mar 9, 2025 #62
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,845
    1,324
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
  3. Mar 9, 2025 #63
    Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    90,411
    27,244
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
  4. Mar 9, 2025 #64
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,845
    1,324
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Whenever we walk outside we are subjected to radiation. Granted, my thread title is provocative, but to study here puts it nicely, “discrepancy between perception and results”, with common perception being that, for all the horror of the blast (which is contained) it’s the fallout that makes nukes so horrible. Judging from Hiroshima, Nagasaki and subsequent tests and accidents … it’s up for debate.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Mar 9, 2025 #65
    Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    90,411
    27,244
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yes, we even use radiation to treat cancers.
     
  6. Mar 9, 2025 #66
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,845
    1,324
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    I might put that in the category of the guys who tickled the dragon.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. Mar 9, 2025 #67
    pogba

    pogba GC Legend

    614
    134
    1,788
    Nov 28, 2013
    Up for debate by whom exactly? They know these answers and have studied them. Just because you don't understand the studies and read blogs from people who have no clue what they are talking about, doesn't make it "up for debate"
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Mar 9, 2025 #68
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,845
    1,324
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    You don’t do science. You enforce orthodoxy.
     
  9. Mar 9, 2025 #69
    pogba

    pogba GC Legend

    614
    134
    1,788
    Nov 28, 2013
    No, scientists do science. Bloggers who have no clue what they are talking about are not going to have a claim to change what is known at a point in time by scientists by saying stuff like "mustard gas was used, not bombs. Citation: Jimmy 2 times at 7-11". If you have a Phd and are in a lab, please let me know and I will update my assertion.
     
  10. Mar 9, 2025 #70
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,845
    1,324
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    If you were to be transported back to the time of Galileo’s house arrest you would have told the guards, “I’m going with you. I want to see that clown’s face when you cuff him!”
     
  11. Mar 9, 2025 #71
    pogba

    pogba GC Legend

    614
    134
    1,788
    Nov 28, 2013
    You link a random substack of a guy who thinks vaccines are witchcraft (direct quote) and that includes citations that potentially mustard gas was used instead of nuclear weapons and are equating that to...Galileo?
     
  12. Mar 9, 2025 #72
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,845
    1,324
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Almost forgot, the mustard gas guy was an MD.

    Who are you to question a doctor ?
     
  13. Mar 9, 2025 #73
    pogba

    pogba GC Legend

    614
    134
    1,788
    Nov 28, 2013
    An MD. Was his board certified specialty nuclear warfare?
     
Page 4 of 4