Alien Enemies Act - Attempted - Blocked Again - Another L

Why do magats assume that everyone who disagrees with Premier Krasnov is a liberal? There are plenty of us registered Republicans who are sickened by his lack of respect for the Constitution and the Rule of Law.

 

Democrats love criminals? You're really trying to make that point as if it's real?

The question is this: Is the president bound by any laws or is he allowed to do whatever he wants?

 

Guy who literally cast a presidential vote for a criminal is complaining that other people like criminals. Too funny.

And this in order to justify his criminal breaking the law.

 

When you have nothing to stand on morally, intellectually or legally this is the only thing you can say.

 

Immigrants are an out-group, so the law should bind but not protect them. Donald Trump is his in-group, so the law should protect but not bind him.

 

Another dangerous criminal: a Canadian entrepreneur that produces drinks with legal hemp but who has "unprofessional letterhead." We clearly need to lock her up in a for-profit prison for letterhead violations.

https://www.10news.com/news/local-n...tained-by-ice-after-entering-san-diego-border

 

They most likely voted for him because they thought that he would lower prices and secure the Southern border even though they knew that he was a criminal.

 

libs always focus on the exception

 

Who needs due process and Constitutional protections anyway? Not undocumented aliens, am I right?!? Unless, of course, first they come for the aliens and I do not speak out, because I'm not an alien....

What gives Trump the power to use war time actions when there has been no official declaration of war?

 

The big problem is you and others think there are "exceptions" lol

 

There is nothing "wrong" with this view VAg8r1, but I think it doesn't tell the whole story. The left went too far with lawfare and that backfired.

The Trump bump in the polls after each of these judicial actions was real.

Dems should have learned from the Clinton years. Just because combing through the Clintons' past business dealings could yield legal results doesn't change the fact that it was driven by politics. The Rose Law Firm billing records never would have seen the light of day unless Clinton was the POTUS.

There are a lot of people out there who have been unfairly targeted by laws due to ulterior motives of the prosecutor. A lot of them are minorities.

Every time the law was abused to score political points against Cinton or Trump, they got a bump.

I agree with you that people ignored Trump's past legal violations - but I think the lawfare actually helped him in the end.

The irony is that if Clinton and Trump had spent their lives carefully crafting a legally bulletproof business past (aka Romney) they would have been worse off, not better.

 

Still doesn't defend who the invading military is. Nor is there an official declaration of war. How can Trump us war-time powers when there is no official war going on? And speaking of official declaration of war, that's a power that belongs to Congress, not the President.

I would also ask the POTUS to actually provide proof of this "invasion!" Why should we just take his word on things? If the POTUS is going to use war-time powers by claiming an increase in murders of innocent civilians, then prove it! Suspending habeus corpus shouldn't be done lightly, or by decree, because the President is selling nothing but bullcrap! Especially since the overall homicide rate has been dropping, and is almost at its lowest rate in 20 years.



What Trump is doing is marching us directly towards Fascism. First they suspend protections for an undesirable group, and if you oppose, you are questioned about opposing Constitutional protections for such a bad group! But next, they come for another group, and then another. And when they get to you, better hope there is someone left to speak up for you!

 

Are we at war?

 

Steve Bannon on mass deportations to El Salvador: "If there's some innocent gardeners in there? Hey, tough break for a swell guy."

 

The end justifies the means. You ain't seen nothing yet.

 

Hilarious. Here are the words of a felon, who was pardoned by a different felon;

If there's some innocent gardeners in there? Hey, tough break for a swell guy. That's where we stand. We're getting these criminals out of the United States.

^ Start with yourself and Donald Trump, buddy!

 

Being shipped to a foreign gulag in a country that you aren't from: tough break. Seems on-brand.