Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Abbott Takes over Houston Schools

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8trGr8t, Mar 15, 2023.

  1. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,467
    12,163
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    not to be outdone, Abbott has ordered the replacement of the locally elected school board of Houston, one of the largest school districts in the state. I am sure there are worse performing districts in that big state somewhere but he choose a dem controlled muni to take over while blaming it on performance.

    Texas announces takeover of Houston schools, stirring anger (yahoo.com)

    Texas officials on Wednesday announced a state takeover of Houston's nearly 200,000-student public school district, the eighth-largest in the country, acting on years of threats and angering Democrats who assailed the move as political.

    The announcement, made by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's education commissioner, Mike Morath, amounts to one of the largest school takeovers ever in the U.S. It also deepens a high-stakes rift between Texas' largest city, where Democrats wield control locally and state Republican leaders have sought increasing authority following election fumbles and COVID-19 restrictions.

    In a letter to the Houston Independent School District, Morath said the Texas Education Agency will replace Superintendent Millard House II and the district's elected board of trustees with an appointed board of managers made of residents from within the district's boundaries.

    Morath said the board has failed to improve student outcomes while conducting “chaotic board meetings marred by infighting" and violating open meetings act and procurement laws. He accused the district of failing to provide proper special education services and of violating state and federal laws with its approach to supporting students with disabilities.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Are we going to get details or just chose sides now?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  3. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,467
    12,163
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    It would take an extreme case of dereliction of duty for me to support a state authority dismissing a locally elected board or authority and replacing it with a board from a different political party than the one that was elected. Only side I am on is the local ability to choose their own representatives.

    wouldn't you agree?
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2023
    • Winner Winner x 6
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Like Like x 3
  4. exiledgator

    exiledgator Gruntled

    11,239
    2,003
    3,128
    Jan 5, 2010
    Maine
    Didn't Desantis do the same in FL (Broward?)
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  5. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,467
    12,163
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    yes, and all of his appointees were voted out in the next election cycle, but not before they did their task and fired the super that refused to lift the mask requirement as DeS demanded.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. altalias

    altalias GC Hall of Fame

    2,681
    2,314
    2,028
    Aug 13, 2008
    • Informative Informative x 3
  7. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,210
    6,164
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Small government and local control are good, unless the locality elects Democrats. Then, it's bad, and we must strip away their power to elect their own representatives.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Winner Winner x 3
  8. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    11,906
    1,168
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Why would political affiliation matter for a school board?
    Are they typically partisan races?
    I don’t think in my area their political affiliation are noted(I could be wrong) don’t recall looking at that in the past.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    11,906
    1,168
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Do you think this has anything to do with it?
    “ Morath said the board has failed to improve student outcomes while conducting “chaotic board meetings marred by infighting" and violating open meetings act and procurement laws. He accused the district of failing to provide proper special education services and of violatingstate and federal laws with its approach to supportingstudents with disabilities”

    Or is it just because it’s Dem run?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. lacuna

    lacuna VIP Member

    63,363
    3,732
    2,353
    Apr 8, 2007
    Redlands, Colorado
    Knowing the political affiliation of a SB candidate is an indicator of how that prospective member will regulate the board. Two years ago the Mesa County's (- you know, home of the infamous former Mesa County elections supervisor, Tina Peters who was arrested for tampering with voting machines and scheduled for trial this summer, and largest city in Congresswoman Lauren gun toting Boebert's congressional district 3) area 51 school district added 3 newly elected members to the 5 person board. The three of them - 2 women and a man ran as a team supporting each other and supported by one of the several conservative political action groups that have sprung up to promote and support far right candidates.

    The first action they made was to elect one of their team as chairman of the board. With their slim majority they can virtually ignore the two members who were already on the board. The second thing they did was fire District 51's attorney who was terminated so they could hire a conservative legal team out of Colorado Springs, despite a local ordinance stating an attorney retained by the local school board must practice in Mesa County. Colorado Springs is on the eastern side of the Rockies, 300+ miles, a plane ride, or a 4 to 5 hour drive away.

    More recently they voted to close a middle school at the end of the academic year on extremely short - 10 day - notice to the school's staff, faculty, students, and parents. A public meeting with no published agenda was announced on a Friday afternoon the day before a Saturday afternoon meeting where discussion was limited before they voted. Attendance and pushback were poor due to the short notice.

    This past week the 3 lock step board members voted to exclude the Marillac Health Clinic that was planned for the newest Grand Junction High now under construction. This clinic was included in plans for the new school that had been drawn up before the newest members were elected. They found a reason to exclude the clinic that has no bearing on the running of the clinic - a law suit filed by a former employee charging discrimination.

    The reasons for having a clinic are sound. Parents unable to take children to appointments, illness, injuries, psychological counseling for students inclined to suicide.

    "There are 70 school-based health providers in Colorado. They offer students wellness checks, sports exams, strep tests, care for chronic conditions like diabetes, mental and sexual health care — and some offer dental screenings. They often see underserved children and youth who have limited access to health care. More than 40 percent of Grand Junction High’s students are eligible for free and reduced-price lunch and a third are students of color."
    Despite pleas from students, school board rejects health clinic for new Grand Junction High School

    One of the three insisted they were basing their decision on their doubts the clinic would be good for all of the students who will attend the new school. Adding there were parents who did not want the clinic in the school.

    They did offer to assist the clinic in obtaining land across the street from the school property, but Marillac turned down the offer insisting they must be in the school and available to students who might otherwise not feel comfortable leaving the school to go to the off campus clinic. Marillac has obtained funding for the clinic but forfeit the funds if the clinic is not in the school.

    Yes, Colorado’s school board races are becoming more politicized. Here’s why (Published in 2021)

    "The uncivil behavior, threats, attacks, intimidation and threats to board members’ children, has become too much for some. Paul Pitton, who resigned recently as vice-chair from Mesa County Valley 51’s board, said in his resignation letter, “Politics have crept in and have no place in the public school system.”

    "A board member in the Garfield RE-2 School District also resigned last week. In her resignation speech, Katie Mackley said she could no longer do the work of cultivating innovation and achievement in the district.

    “'Unfortunately, the important and real work of the Garfield RE-2 School Board continues to be upended by community members who choose to place personal politics and social media notoriety above the education of students in this district,' she said. 'This is not the community I grew up in.'”

    The district recently instituted a mask mandate because of high quarantine levels among students. Mackley said board members have been maligned on social media, screamed at, and stalked in public. One of her children has become the victim of retaliation.
    ----------------------------------

    The former vice chairman of the Mesa County District 51 school board resigned from the board before the last election wrote this in his resignation letter, “Politics have crept in and have no place in the public school system.” His resignation opened the third vacancy allowing a majority comprised of the 3 new members


    The question - Given the intimidation, threats and more, will people with experience in schools continue to run for school board?

    In light of all this I would say yes, political affiliation does matter.
     
    • Informative Informative x 5
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. exiledgator

    exiledgator Gruntled

    11,239
    2,003
    3,128
    Jan 5, 2010
    Maine
    Giving the benefit of the doubt on motive, this is still a very un American, big government move. This is not conservative governance.

    A citizen is free to support moves like this (whether they are legal or not), but they shouldn't call themselves conservative.
     
    • Agree x 5
    • Like x 2
    • Winner x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny x 1
    • Creative x 1
  12. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,210
    6,164
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    It's 100% because it's "Dem run." Like DeSantis's removal of Andrew Warren, the Republican claim for why they're doing it is merely a pretext.
     
    • Agree Agree x 8
  13. RealGatorFan

    RealGatorFan Premium Member

    15,058
    7,725
    2,893
    Apr 3, 2007
    I would. Come to the Birmingham City Schools and I'll change your mind in 15 minutes. It's so rife with corruption over the decades that families have been leaving the city for years. Everyone outside of Alabama thinks Birmingham is the most populous city but you would be wrong. Birmingham isn't even 2nd or 3rd, but now 4th. Remember Jefferson County? The largest county in the US to ever file for bankruptcy? It includes the city of Birmingham. I wished Alabama would take over the entire county and throw out all politicians.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  14. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,267
    1,909
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    If you choose the side of the state kicking out people from elected office and replacing them with handpicked partisans, what side is that?
     
    • Winner Winner x 6
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  15. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,267
    1,909
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    So, you're citing a partisan state official justifying the takeover?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,746
    1,644
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    As always, when confronted with the question of what is the true correct course of political action, the real question is “who decides?” The answer that America adopted to best safeguard liberty is no one in particular. As @exiledgator alludes above, the American conservative answer added to no one in particular that this decision-making body should include only those closest to the situation. Often the answer given by these new republicans, like Trump, Abbot, and DeSantis, is that they themselves should decide.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  17. G8R92

    G8R92 GC Hall of Fame

    3,302
    373
    378
    Feb 5, 2010
    Florida legislature moving forward with a constitutional amendment on the 2024 ballot to make school board elections partisan.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  18. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    The centralization of power with republicans is nothing new, and it’s nearly impossible for Republicans to govern if democracy keeps getting in the way. So we now have a political party (republican) that’s following the teachings of Karl Marx finding they can govern easier via a communist form of government with Communism, a centralized form of government led by them only that is often authoritarian in its rule.

    Republicans are now neo-communist.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,467
    12,163
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    I think what you are describing re: Jefferson County, would fall under the obvious dereliction of duty, as would the water systems in Michigan and Mississippi that failed. ALl of those, imo, represent an obvious dereliction of duty that required correction. Even then, it could have been done with surgical precision instead of carpet bombing the entire board. If the Houston board is currently dysfunctional, appoint a mediator to bring focus and command to the room, Help them be successful, don't just discharge en masse and replace with your cronies (see Broward County, New Hope, Reedy Creek) who read from the same bible you do. Installing wholly unqualified disciples of your team into positions of authority that are supposed to represent all of the interests of those involved is just adding salt to the wound. Even if entire boards need to be removed, then replace them with qualified people of differing opinions from within the neighborhood. These are naked power grabs cloaked in some minor sheen of whatever problem they can find and magnify.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
  20. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,267
    1,909
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    I think people need to reckon with the fact that our republican system allows the same sort of authoritarianism as another country calling itself a republic too, like the USSR or China. Same systems of government! And basically the same level of commitment to democracy too it seems. Local governance is not guaranteed under our Constitution and if its guarantee of republican governance at state level cant be used to stop things like this, what good is it?
     
    • Agree Agree x 3