Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

A team from SpaceX is being brought in to overhaul FAA’s air traffic control system

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8tas, Feb 17, 2025 at 6:42 PM.

  1. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    That reason is you either don't want to answer the question or you don't know what level of access the secretary of defense has. But I agree, there is no point in continuing this conversation since you won't answer the question.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,854
    278
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    So lots of top experts in the field dealing with healthcare, would not be financially invested in the healthcare market?
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2025 at 9:34 PM
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Beyond a small amount of stock in a 401k, sure. There are people who spend their entire career studying that stuff. You figure high up megamillionaire executives are the only people who know anything about the healthcare system?
     
  4. slayerxing

    slayerxing GC Hall of Fame

    5,289
    907
    2,078
    Aug 14, 2007
    No conflict, no interest. At some point you have to trust some kind of expert in a field who may have some conflicts. There usually aren’t experts in a field without some financial investment or ties. Doesn’t mean they are completely incapable of being objective, necessarily.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,854
    278
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    My point is that anyone that is an expert on the healthcare system as a whole and that would need to come from the private sector, would have to be a Healthcare executive and likely be worth tens of millions of dollars, which would mean they would have more than "a small amount stock in a 401k." You are not going to find the level of expertise you would want in someone that is not worth north of several million dollars.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
  6. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,854
    278
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    So that means we are OK with someone conducting the audits that have potential OCI issues?
     
  7. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Like Musk deciding what to cut from NASA's budget? No.
     
  8. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    34,040
    12,346
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    their forward p/e is 120. nearly double what it was a year ago.

    where are you seeing a forward p/e of 10? I would like to buy some of that

    even Nvidia is less than 60

    Musk has gone full Howard Hughes. Just a matter of if/ not when. Ketamine is a hell of a drug
     
  9. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    34,040
    12,346
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    I believe my lying eyes watching their humanoids move. that and their cheap production capabilities and desire to dominate world industries. i also believe in their ability to steal, extort, or negotiate for base IP and then enhance it with little added cost
     
  10. slayerxing

    slayerxing GC Hall of Fame

    5,289
    907
    2,078
    Aug 14, 2007
    I think context matters. In some contexts im sure it’s fine. Especially if people are transparent and disclose their conflicts and recuse themselves from the worst of it. This is also where committees could be helpful. If there is a right answer on that I’m open to hearing it lol.
     
  11. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    8,520
    1,232
    2,543
    Apr 8, 2007
    Nobody should have access to classified systems if they do not have the proper clearances and a need to know.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  12. magnetofsnatch

    magnetofsnatch Rudy Ray Moore’s Idol Premium Member

    1,151
    305
    1,783
    Apr 10, 2020
    North Florida
    Yes forward P/E’s by analysts that have never understood Tesla are how I’d base my investment thesis. The addressable market for labor is in the trillions and humanoids are Teslas way of capitalizing on that market. If you believe Tesla is a failing company then short it. That’s worked out very well for people over the past 10 years.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,854
    278
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    So back to the Jamie Dimon example. Would you be OK with Dimon and a team from Wall St doing an audit of Treasury if they disclosed their OCI issues publicly?
     
  14. slayerxing

    slayerxing GC Hall of Fame

    5,289
    907
    2,078
    Aug 14, 2007
    I certainly don’t feel comfortable making that decision alone lol. I guess if enough people vouched for Dimon and the other members of whatever committee was assigned the task, anb said committee operated transparently I’d be ok.
     
  15. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,854
    278
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    So you think it would have to be a committee and not led by a single person?
     
  16. slayerxing

    slayerxing GC Hall of Fame

    5,289
    907
    2,078
    Aug 14, 2007
    maybe that’s the higher ed in me. Committees are not the most efficient but they often protect you by stopping a single unscrupulous person, or preventing a single biased person from driving a decision. With notable exceptions. It’s a tough call. For something as important as treasury id prefer more than one person. No more than 5. But again, I’m not pretending to be an expert on setting up audits. Just trying to think through it.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  17. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Agree. Should Musk have access to classified systems?
     
  18. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    8,520
    1,232
    2,543
    Apr 8, 2007
    He should have access to systems he has the clearance for and the need to know. Just like everyone else. I suspect you really have a more specific question though but perhaps don’t know how to ask it.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  19. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    125,127
    164,536
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Musk does have a top secret security clearance.
     
  20. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    What systems should Musk have the clearance and need-to-know for? Should he be allowed access to anything he wants access to? Because that's what he's gotten so far at treasury, SS admin, etc.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1