Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

2024 NCAA Men's basketball tournament

Discussion in 'Nuttin but Net' started by gogators73, Jan 23, 2024.

  1. GatorLurker

    GatorLurker GC Hall of Fame

    9,352
    3,966
    3,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    Is the Committee so dumb that they think there is much difference between a Q1 win over a Net 50 team as opposed to a Q2 win over a Net 51 team on a neutral court?

    Do they consider a Q1 win on the road over a Top 10 Net team the same as a Q1 win at home over a Net 25 team?

    I would hope not.

    This Q1 to Q4 Net ranking can be rigged by schedule much like the RPI could be back in the dark ages. Coach K was a master at doing it.

    I prefer evaluating teams by objective measures that have been validated over years of data like KenPom. I miss Sagarin Predictor but I guess he doesn't do that anymore. Now that everybody knows about these my huge advantage in picking NCAA pools has gone away. One year in a rather large pool I came in first and my wife (with a lot of help from me) came in second. Those days are long gone.

    Funny but true story. Way back in 1982 my not then wife took a job in Austin, Texas with a geotechnical consulting firm that had their own drill crews for subsurface investigation. The drillers had a long standing college football pool every fall weekend and asked my bride-to-be to participate thinking it would just make it a bigger payday for the winner. Every Thursday night I would get a call from her asking for my picks. Now because I had no emotional attachment to any of these teams I was able to make rational picks for her.

    She won the first three or four pools and then they told her that they no longer did that. Of course they were lying. They just wanted her out. And they must have been embarrassed that a "skirt" knew more about college football than they did.
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2024
  2. RD_gator

    RD_gator GC Hall of Fame

    1,877
    408
    1,883
    Jul 20, 2007
    The other #2 seeds: 2-Kansas, 2-Tennessee and 2-Marquette. They all seem hard for Florida.

    South Carolina is also a 7-seed as of this moment.
     
  3. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    22,886
    5,580
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    All this is why I’ve failed against the NET system for years. From a statistical standpoint, it borders on moronic. I could have 3 home wins against teams 26-35. But the home team that gets one win over the 25th team gets some magical extra credit and is looked at more favorably by their system. There are 340 D1 teams or whatever the number is now, the differences between 25 and 35 are tiny, And that holds true across all their metrics, it’s far too rigid on what’s good and bad. Give me an actual computer model any day.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. grant1

    grant1 GC Hall of Fame

    3,357
    527
    408
    Nov 10, 2009
    This is where it gets fun, talking about seeding and matchups instead of worrying about just getting in.


    Doesn't the NCAA bring in Refs from other regions? I wouldn't think they would get home-cooked ACC refs to screw like they did at Wake.
     
  5. gatormonk

    gatormonk GC Hall of Fame

    7,802
    6,757
    2,803
    Apr 3, 2007
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 3
    • Like Like x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. GatorLurker

    GatorLurker GC Hall of Fame

    9,352
    3,966
    3,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    First of all refs are not tied to conferences.

    IIRC Doug Shows and Ted Valentine were two of the refs at the Wake Forest game. Those two idiots call lots of SEC games and I cringe every time I see them on the floor. Shows is just a showboat that thinks that people are at the game to see him. Valentine is just incompetent
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. gogators73

    gogators73 GC Hall of Fame

    3,371
    400
    333
    Oct 30, 2007
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Alabama loss didn’t hurt seeding at all.

    Goal for the next two games is to get to 10 SEC wins. Anything less will be a monstrous failure.
     
  8. gatormonk

    gatormonk GC Hall of Fame

    7,802
    6,757
    2,803
    Apr 3, 2007
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  9. 407king

    407king GC Hall of Fame

    3,442
    2,064
    1,998
    Dec 8, 2018
    Would be an interesting pairing with a rematch in our first game. But hard to believe that Texas A&M would still a 10-seed at this point.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. gatormonk

    gatormonk GC Hall of Fame

    7,802
    6,757
    2,803
    Apr 3, 2007
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  11. Gatorhead5

    Gatorhead5 GC Hall of Fame

    1,595
    2,909
    2,053
    Apr 10, 2007
    ESPN has us as a 7 playing Nebraska…IN OMAHA! Make that make sense.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. oneatatime

    oneatatime GC Hall of Fame

    5,673
    504
    398
    Apr 19, 2007
    Big difference between a #6 and #7. a 7-2 matchup would likely be very much a crowd disadvantage, but a 6-3, not so much.

    Once you get to the second weekend, you still wouldn't see a top seed until the elite 8, so again the crowd disadvantage wouldn't be so great.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  13. GatorPlanet

    GatorPlanet GC Hall of Fame

    9,251
    2,149
    1,088
    Apr 15, 2007
    Maitland, FL
    Why in the world would Nebraska get that kind of almost-home-game?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. GatorLurker

    GatorLurker GC Hall of Fame

    9,352
    3,966
    3,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    Maybe this should be posted in the "Lunardi Is a Moron" thread.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  15. 407king

    407king GC Hall of Fame

    3,442
    2,064
    1,998
    Dec 8, 2018
    OM already in the bonus with 11 minutes left in the 1st half vs South Carolina
     
  16. Agator88

    Agator88 GC Hall of Fame

    1,155
    389
    1,898
    Oct 7, 2014
    Beard told them what he wanted to see after the miss state game haha
     
  17. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    31,785
    54,915
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    I thought it was moron too, but it was actually Maroon, which spurred my comment about the Moline Maroons.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Agator88

    Agator88 GC Hall of Fame

    1,155
    389
    1,898
    Oct 7, 2014
    Big win for wake today, should help us out as well.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  19. gogators73

    gogators73 GC Hall of Fame

    3,371
    400
    333
    Oct 30, 2007
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Pitt putting the finishing touches on Virginia Tech to get them hopefully back close to 50.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  20. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    31,785
    54,915
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    One more victory assures a winning SEC record. Like others, I hoped for 10-8 or better and felt that would be enough to earn a tourney bid. The Gator boyz have a legit chance to do better now. Mizzou is winless in the SEC. Every team has pride and sometimes a wounded cat is dangerous. Let's take care of buziness on Wednesday and get that 10th win, with a chance then for three more.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2