Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

200 Names linked to Epstein expected to be released soon

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by WarDamnGator, Jan 2, 2024.

  1. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,645
    13,311
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    and we thought these rich elites on both sides of the aisle were only in bed together in a figurative sense....
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  2. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,634
    2,881
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    So I’m reading this piece this am and come across this:


    The phone messages, while mostly mundane, give a small taste of those associations.

    “She had on the phone Mr. Harvey Weinstein,” reads one message about a missed call.

    Weinstein, then a force in Hollywood, was once part of a media investment group that included Epstein.

    “At the time, Epstein was seen as a wealthy power broker with access to many people of various industries and for many reasons,” said Weinstein’s spokesperson, Juda Engelmayer. “It wasn’t uncommon for people of that caliber to talk, as we see from the lists that have been coming out. There was and remains nothing more to that.”


    How does Harvey Weinstein still have a press flack? How can he afford one and how any human with a soul still be willing to spin for him? Talk about privilege and corruption
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2024
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,520
    942
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  4. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,634
    2,881
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2024
  5. Gator515151

    Gator515151 GC Hall of Fame

    22,591
    1,027
    1,763
    Apr 4, 2007
  6. ElimiGator

    ElimiGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,370
    1,422
    1,908
    Apr 8, 2007
    Jax
    I saw some comments on another site discussing the released photos. “The girls looked happy.” WTH?
    Keep an open mind with all this pedo revelation stuff. There are no party lines here.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  7. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,775
    1,222
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Democrats not giving up, know they’ll find Trump’s name on the list …

    upload_2024-1-8_22-31-53.jpeg
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. DawgFanFromAlabam

    DawgFanFromAlabam GC Hall of Fame

    2,392
    310
    308
    Apr 18, 2007
    It’s a different “Dawgfanfromalabam.”
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  9. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,634
    2,881
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
     
  10. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,520
    942
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    Trump is 'Doe 174' which should be his new name everywhere.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  11. mikemcd810

    mikemcd810 Premium Member

    1,957
    436
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    Is there any chance that public outcry may lead to reopening investigations or has that ship sailed? I'm not one for conspiracies but there are so many rich and powerful people across the political spectrum and internationally that I can believe this was buried improperly.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Gator40

    Gator40 Avada Kedavra

    14,235
    521
    538
    Apr 3, 2007
    I thought the list was going to be full of drag queens.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,307
    2,106
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    I mean, there's really no evidence as far as we know. Flight logs and a victims testimony, unless I'm missing anything? That's not gonna get anyone arrested.
     
  14. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,430
    6,092
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  15. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,645
    13,311
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Maybe that prima donna's 15 minutes of fame can be over ? ( please?) enough already.
     
  16. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,919
    1,369
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    He had Rodgers back on and instead of apologizing he tried to say it wasn't an accusation against Jimmy Kimmel and that he meant that Kimmel would be mad that a list came out all, not that he'd be on it ... an explanation that doesn't make a whole lot of sense... Rodgers was clearly referring to a fake document being spread in the right wing moron sphere that said Kimmel had ties to Epstein ...

    “I said, that a lot of people, and I’m quoting myself here, ‘a lot of people — including Jimmy Kimmel — are really hoping thatdoesn’t come out,’ end quotes, that’s what I said,” Rodgers told McAfee. “I was referring to the fact that if there is a list — which again, this hasn’t come out yet, this was just a deposition — and there are names on it, then that would be the second time that a soft brain, junior college student, you know, wacko anti-vax, anti-Semite, purveyor, spreading misinformation, conspiracy theorists, MAGA — whatever other things have been said by him and other people in the media — would be right twice.”

    I guess that's why he's banned ...

    Aaron Rodgers blames media in response to Jimmy Kimmel’s comments about him | CNN
     
  17. mikemcd810

    mikemcd810 Premium Member

    1,957
    436
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    Pretty interesting...zero hesitation on 9/11 and JFK files but not so much on the Epstein files.

    You can make the claim that Trump may just want to protect other people who may be innocent from having their name associated with Epstein, but the next time Trump considers someone other than himself it will be the first time.

     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  18. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,055
    1,745
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    “phony stuff”.
     
  19. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,430
    6,092
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
    I would never be confused with a trump apologist. But I do t wholly disagree with him there. Guilt by association is a real thing, unless there’s evidence that someone actually did something wrong not sure it’s fair to tar everyone.
     
  20. mikemcd810

    mikemcd810 Premium Member

    1,957
    436
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    I fully agree with you that the names shouldn't be released. I'm just skeptical that Trump is being altruistic with his explanation.

    Also, didn't he say he was going to declassify all this kind of stuff during his 2016 campaign?