2,000 mules

The perfect mark for con men like D'Souza.

 

Oh, I see. Everything written or shown to make Biden look bad is untrue and fabricated. Hard to think they went to so much trouble to make a fake White House reception room complete with imposters impersonating Biden, Obama, Harris, et al.
But, you are right I shouldn’t be on YouTube. The now defunct truth department with that whacked out liberal lady would be coming after me. I was worried AG Merritt Garland would come after me like he went after the white supremests AKA parents who refused to let their children learn the stupid ass Woke BS you guys probably believe in.

 

It is not your fault you were suckered by right-wing wacko media, it's how they grift off the Pubs. It never hurts to maintain a watch on MSM and even a lefty source as well to get a balanced viewpoint. Simply turn off Fox unless it's watched for entertainment not news ( they've stated that is what it is)

 

Whoever made it edited the video to make it look like Biden was aimlessly wandering looking for someone to shake hands with. The full length unedited event didn’t show that. The fact that you defend the video you saw vehemently just shows who deeply into the world of fantasy that you are. Just look for the thread here. You don’t have to take my word for it. Just look for the thread on GC and locate the post where the full video was posted.

 

No, he keeps backtracking on his claims; at each specific response he admits the has no proof

 

D'Souza's first claim is they have direct testimony of one of the mules as to what they were doing and how much they were paid. The interviewer points out that this isn't true, and True the Vote did not provide any evidence that this is true. D'Souza's comeback was that this was a movie, and you can't include all the details in a move.

D'Souza's second claim is that the mules had to take pictures of the ballots going into the dropbox to get paid. The interviewer points out that most of the people taking pictures are taking pictures without the ballots, they are selfies or pictures of the ballot box after dropping the ballots. D'Souza's comeback was that the footage was grainy and you can't see very clearly what's happening.

This was my favorite part:

D'Souza says it isn't his fault he doesn't have video evidence of the same mules showing up at different dropboxes because that video doesn't exist.

D'Souza goes on to say the purpose of the movie isn't to prove this happened, just to suggest a possibility to spur the investigators to look into it and gather evidence proving it happened.

Ouch, quotes one of the True the Vote people (that is the group whose data this fanciful film is based on), saying "I want to make very clear that we’re not suggesting the ballots that were cast were illegal ballots".

D'Souza agrees with the interviewer that he doesn't have any actual evidence that things happened this way:

 

Ok I just saw the clips; I stand corrected, that was an incomplete video that was shameful to show. But, I think the scenes where he is looking into the Obama circle, trying to get his attention to no avail is not a good look. Obama is ignoring him. If I’m looking at that and know nothing about it, I’m thinking this guy is an old codger and nobody wants to talk to him. Can you guys just admit Joe Biden is a poor candidate and ineffective leader and politician? If he was Republican, I surely would! Despite what you may think, most Trump supporters do NOT like everything he does.

 

Suckers

 

Why does it always come back to Russia with those people?

 

Seriously? I thought this was a joke, but it's a WaPo link. $30 for fake maps, showing fake routes, based on faulty assumptions ...

 

1. How do you KNOW the whistle blower even exists, and if he/she does exist, he/she is telling the truth? The only ones that supposedly talked to the whistleblower is a highly partisan Trumper organization. The Georgia Investigators wanted to talk to him/her, couldn't find him/her. All you have is a film makers interpretation of what an anonymous whistle blower supposedly told someone else, with ZERO evidence to support any of it.

2. Voting organizations were asking people to take selfies and photos of them dropping off their ballots to post of social media and promote early voting. The number of people shown in the film taking a selfie at a drop box is TWO. TWO! Do you think it's possible two people took selfies for social media to promote early voting?

 

From the link...

It's starting to appear this film is full of straight up lies.

This is perhaps the closest thing to "solid evidence" the film presents. A route of single of person who supposedly visited several drop boxes in one day. The orange dots are supposedly drop boxes. EXCEPT ... they are not ... some of them are close to drop box locations, but some are not even the ball park. WaPo overlaid the real map of drop boxes, and large white circles, and you can see they clearly do not match up, and furthermore, it shows this person was not visiting drop boxes at all. That is damning evidence that this film is a complete fraud, but not voter fraud.



Then there is this ... an image shown in the film that supposedly shows a mule in Gwennit County, complete with a photo of his car, no less....



But what it is is an flipped image of Moscow. Yes, the film is so deceitful that the maker actually reversed the image, hoping nobody noticed it wasn't Atlanta, but actually Moscow.



Now is your chance to defend this horseshit.

 

Creative excuse? D'Souza was asked why he only showed two people taking selfies in the film and if he knew it was somewhat common for people to post pictures of themselves voting on social media. He didn't really have an answer.