Irrelevant and can't read. I said nothing about his offense, I said hiring a coach from KSU would excite nobody which of course remains true.
You haven't been proven anything. Just because Billy turned out to be bad doesn't mean that Mullen didn't need to go.
This is an incorrect characterization but more importantly it's irrelevant. The question was why would anyone take Lea over Klieman?
[img]
Why would he deserve consideration over Klieman?
AA was on the sideline last year and this defense looks a lot more like what he called last year.
Losing will be his undoing, people thinking this scared money thing is clever or relevant in any way will be this board's undoing.
This to me is actually his biggest problem. Weird staff with a bunch of co-everythings that has not been effective.
idgaf if he ran or threw, he lost. People want him now so they'll make excuses, the same way people hate Billy now so they'll blame him for...
My post is pointing out some things that he did badly, what on earth leads you to believe this?
Honestly he hasn't shown the ability to put together a top flight staff thus far, RR just made the defense worse, don't see why someone would...
The humility to leave? What coach just up and leaves because they're not having success? He's going to get fired like every other coach that...
Imagine putting bacon on this post... y'all need to get a grip
You're the one who said we were allergic to passing. That was wrong.
Oh come on, you can acknowledge he called the TD play. Don't worry, he's still getting fired.
Read the post I quoted. Then realize that you're the one that doesn't understand, I'm certainly not defending Billy as a coach.
Losing is never better.
I mean he called the play that got us the TD in the first place