I agree it will not happen but if the intent is to stop authoritarian governments what I stated is the best solution. Otherwise it is a never...
If the argument that is being used is to stop and get rid of authoritarian governments the only way to do that is to remove them from the board....
They already have a way to get oil to high paying customers. Everything that has been tried to keep Russian oil off of the market up until now has...
I gave three options diplomacy, take Ukraine make it a US territory (it will never be a problem again), or continue down the path of destroying...
I am sorry but the war has not rallied European nations to the cause. You have multiple nations that have suggested a diplomatic approach would be...
You and I are pretty much on same page concerning the war in Ukraine. Unless something drastically changes the Ukrainians are not going to get air...
Nukes have nothing to do with this and I believe I made that clear with regards to NATO and what the US obligation is. I know you've read my...
See post #111813.
It is not a maybe if things continue down this path. It is a foregone conclusion. How long do thing those ships are going to linger off shore? The...
I agree a handful people in congress were mocked and marginalized concerning their stance on Iraq.
I explained NATO's role and intervention in Ukraine Ukraine is not their role. Now if Putin steps into a NATO nation that's a different story. To...
We are darn near a year into this war and many have claimed Russia short on supplies from the very beginning of this war. As for the energy...
People are getting killed every day that is a fact on both sides of the aisle. How many is questionable which is my point. Concerning withdrawal...
Both. Political resolve does not change supply issues which is what we are facing. Nor does it produce much needed natural gas, diesel or kerosene...
The war is far from over. Tides of battle change as war progresses. I don't see Ukraine crossing the Dniper any time soon if at all and pushing...
First we have no idea what the total losses are on either side of the equation at this point. The description you paint is a war of misfits.
That is the stated point of view. Yet it is one we choose not to do. That is the problem and why we are in a war of attrition. Further I doubt...
If you're putting fresh recruits on the front line with minimal training that certainly doesn't speak volumes for the core units does it? BTW we...
Yes I do and I noted my concern about attrition and why this war needs to end soon. The US cannot continue down this path without severely...
Then why impose a mandatory conscription of 18-60 year old males and put them on the front lines no less?
