Alien Enemies Act - Trump Defies 9 - 0 Suprme Court Ruling

if the admin is looking for a fight Boasberg seems willing to give them one

'Willful disregard': Judge finds 'probable cause' to hold Trump admin in criminal contempt - Alternet.org

The judge wrote: “The Court does not reach such conclusion lightly or hastily; indeed, it has given Defendants ample opportunity to rectify or explain their actions. None of their responses has been satisfactory.”

Pointing to the “broader showdown between the Trump administration and the federal judiciary,” the Post reported that Boasberg “[said] the Trump administration’s actions on March 15, as the removal flights proceeded despite his order to the contrary, ‘demonstrate a willful disregard … sufficient for the Court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the Government in criminal contempt.'”

“The Constitution,” Boasberg also wrote, citing previous rulings, “does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders — especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it. To permit such officials to freely ‘annul the judgments of the courts of the United States’ would not just ‘destroy the rights acquired under those judgments’; it would make ‘a solemn mockery’ of ‘the constitution itself.’

 

sad how easily Rubio cucks himself..wonder if they make him wear a chicken suit when he watches

‘Utter Nonsense’: Fox’s Andy McCarthy Nukes Marco Rubio Over ‘Ridiculous’ Argument in Defense of Wrongful Deportation

“As absurd as was Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele’s commentary about the Abrego Garcia case in the Oval Office on Monday, he was matched whopper-for-whopper by Trump administration officials. Consider the secretary of state,” began McCarthy under the headline “Marco Rubio’s Disingenuous Explanation of the Abrego Garcia Case.” “Marco Rubio is too smart not to know that what he was saying was utter nonsense. The secretary haughtily pronounced that he didn’t see what all the fuss was because Abrego Garcia is a Salvadoran national who was illegally in the United States, and who was simply deported to his own country, which is what’s supposed to happen,” he continued before diving deeper into the weeds:

After airbrushing the inconvenient withholding of removal order out of the picture, Rubio went on a ridiculous rant about how the foreign policy of the United States is run by the president, not by a judge. As the former senator is surely aware, the withholding of removal remedy was enacted by Congress. (See Title 8, U.S. Code, §1231(b)(3), “Restriction on removal to a country where alien’s life or freedom would be threatened.”) In this instance, withholding of removal was ordered by an immigration judge, not by Judge Xinis, the Supreme Court, or some other Article III tribunal. That is, it was ordered by an executive branch officer in the first Trump administration. What is stymying the president here is statutory law and the actions and inactions of his own administrations, not a federal judge.

Nor is this anything close to a judicial usurpation of the president’s power to conduct U.S. foreign policy. To repeat (see here and here), the courts have not interfered at all with the power of the president to make a bilateral agreement with a foreign head of state in which the foreign country agreed to cooperate with the federal government regarding the custody of prisoners. Whether to make or not make such an agreement is entirely up to the president. On the other hand, if a litigant in the United States has a legitimate claim that is cognizable in federal court, the executive branch may not obstruct the litigant. Pursuant to his oath of office, the president must conduct foreign policy, just as he must carry out all executive duties, consistent with the laws of the United States.

“A federal court’s vindication of a person’s legal rights is not a matter of the judge trying to wrest control of foreign policy. It’s the law,” concluded McCarthy. “I’m pretty sure Marco Rubio knows that.”

 

actually they want to use overwhelming intimidation to try and avoid a fight

 

what about the person the judge ordered returned?

 

link to him being confirmed a MS1 3member? i've seen several that state otherwise but you must have a judgement from a court I missed. thanks in advance