NC Supreme Court Election

Note sure you saw the most aggravating part... the R controlled supreme court ruled that the 65,000 voters had 15 days to prove they were valid voters or their vote would be thrown out.

They argued that letting even one invalid vote be counted would disenfranchise voters. But apparently throwing out thousands of valid votes won't.

Edit: I was mistaken, it was a lower court that made that ridiculous decision. It has been appealed and stayed.

 

It is the voter's responsibility to prove they are legit. They won't be contacted, they haven't even been told they are on the list.

It is all very bogus.

 

So how do they know who these 65000 people voted for? Don’t they required that once the signature is verified, the ballot is separated from the signature, for voter privacy?

 

From the NC election board on mail in ballots….

“Will anyone know who I voted for?

No. Ballots remain in the sealed absentee envelope until they have been fully approved by the board. During the counting process, the ballot is removed from the envelope and fed into the tabulator. Ballots are secret by law, and others will not know who you voted for.”

So what is the plan, here, throw out votes based on the percentages of how the 60,000 people are registered, regardless of how they actually voted?

 

Voter ID should be a no-brainer.

 

I thought this too but our secret ballot has a serial number and can be tracked. This is in Florida.

 

So should accepting that you lost a multi-time certified election, but the Republi(cans) seems to have huge issues grasping that.

 

What makes the situation egregious is that (as I understand it) they only challenged ballots in certain areas that lean Democratic, it was not a state-wide challenge of all votes.

 

I think they're doing a lot better policing the voting than they did in 2020. I don't think the dems will be able to pull that off again.

 

Voter ID was required. All of the contested voters provided ID when they voted and met all voting requirements. The apparent issue is with incomplete information in the state's voter database, none of which appears to be relevant to improper identification of those who voted.

 

You mistake me for a trumper. Trumpers think I’m a RINO if not a democrat.

 

then what did you mean by “pull that off in 2020”

 

You're still trying to insinuate the lie about fake election fraud in 2020, huh? Cool.

 

Judge Allison Riggs has a BA, an MA, and a JD from UF. The Republican challenge is only in counties that have Democratic Party majorities. To even make this distorted challenge makes it clear that the Republican candidate is not fit to be a judge at any level or to even practice law.

 

That is what sunk Al Gore in the 2000 Florida recount, SCOTUS ruled that recounts had to be the whole state or nothing… now watch SCOTUS change thier minds if this makes it to them.