Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Let's Be Honest About Mars

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8tas, Mar 11, 2025 at 1:50 PM.

  1. QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,948
    1,723
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    I love space. My middle is fascinated by it. My dad served with 4 Star Retired Kevin Chilton (not to get him in trouble but he is like minded with Conservatives) who headed Space Command and went on STS 49 (pilot)/STS 59 (pilot)/STS 76 Commander. My daughter has a signed picture from him and might follow that route in life.

    That said. I still fail to see the need to go to Mars. Now Space is different…
     
  2. thom1507

    thom1507 All American

    483
    228
    1,718
    Oct 13, 2019
    IMO, there's no good reason to go to Mars. We can do most scientific research with probes at a fraction of the cost. It would cost trillions of dollars to establish a human presence and one that would always teeter on the edge of a complete loss of life to the colony by storms or earthquakes and such.

    And, for what exactly?
     
  3. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    3,800
    835
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    Establishment of a colony on the moon or mars no longer assures mutual destruction in a nuclear war.
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  4. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    5,356
    1,008
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    I agree with you. I'd rather spend the money on space probes to the moons of Saturn and Jupiter
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. magnetofsnatch

    magnetofsnatch Rudy Ray Moore’s Idol Premium Member

    1,243
    318
    1,783
    Apr 10, 2020
    North Florida
    Went to Space Camp in Huntsville, AL as a kid. Was right after the movie came out. It was pretty cool from what I can remember.
     
  6. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    128,262
    58,938
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    I do not expect Mars to happen in my lifetime but do think it will happen at some point
     
  7. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    34,453
    12,396
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    define reasonable
    there are some zealots with potential credentials that would fly under less standards than what nasa used to accept. with doge in charge, who knows if there are safety standards anymore

    but tesla is building robots so..
     
  8. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    34,453
    12,396
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Huntsville is in Al because Texas was too hot and flat for the German scientists and the liked the rolling hills and weather there better
     
  9. ncargat1

    ncargat1 GC Hall of Fame

    14,619
    6,364
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    SpaceX would have run out of money and folded onto itself without government hand outs of just shy of $20B, $14B from NASA and another $5.5 from the Defense Department. The tax payers have received ZERO return on the investment. The epitome of Waste and Fraud.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  10. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    12,146
    1,196
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Part of the plan is to send landers with equipment first and to mine the materials for the return trip on site.
    Also current engines don’t burn fuel the whole way there mostly just on take off. Then the rocket coasts to Mars(actually once you get caught by the Martian gravity it pulls you there).
    3D printers will print new parts as needed.

    I’d bet we send a manned ship by 2040.
     
  11. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    9,542
    1,176
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    That’s just silly and I detest Elon. SpaceX has worked wonders under Gwynne Shotwell and regularly performs NASA missions for cheaper than its competitors and Russia. In other words, those are not “hand outs” but fairly compensated contracts performing a service for the government.
     
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 2
  12. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    12,146
    1,196
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Define Gov “handouts”.

    SpaceX is being paid just like any other contractor to furnish products and services to NASA, this includes much of the lift capacity used since the shuttle was decommissioned.

    Would you rather pay Russia more to do the same thing? Didn’t realize you preferred Putin over a US company.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    12,146
    1,196
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    He’s been explained this before. Must not care or has read one too many garbage memes on the net.
     
  14. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    9,542
    1,176
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    It’s designed to be capable but still needs to be proven out. First step is to simply get it to hold together. The plan is to launch several Starships into orbit at a SpaceX cost of ~$10M each to refuel another Starship and send it to Mars. It calcs out but, as I said above, they have to prove the theoretical.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    125,361
    164,585
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    At this point I think the trip to Mars to establish a colony is a one way mission but I could be wrong.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    125,361
    164,585
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    The government has had astronauts delivered and returned from the ISS as well as numerous resupply missions. All done much cheaper than the Russians would have done it for us.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    9,542
    1,176
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    Certainly no one should go expecting to come back. The launch window is every 26 months with another 8 month transit time each way. So you’re talking nearly 3 years if everything goes perfectly smoothly and they make the first available launch window back to Earth (8 months transit + 18 months on Mars + 8 months transit back).
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  18. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    5,356
    1,008
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    You have to burn fuel to land on Mars and nining Mars for fuel is just a theory. We don't have the technology. If the plan was to land by 2040 there would have already been a plan proposed with an estimated budget. Space probes take at least 15 years of planning with a much smaller budget.

    We're talking about at least a trillion dollars for a human Mars mission because we have to keep those people alive on Mars for well over a year and we have no way to protect them from radiation. The mission is decades away...if ever
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2025 at 11:39 PM
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    12,146
    1,196
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    We already know there is CO2 and H2O Mars the main ingredients to make rocket fuel.
    As far as radiation that’s easy, underground habitats.

    If we want to we can do it.
     
  20. thomadm

    thomadm VIP Member

    3,134
    737
    2,088
    Apr 9, 2007
    Exactly. That's why those that have a brain told the Donald during his first term that the moon is the first step. Building a base there makes the most sense to prove out all the technical hurdles that Space X, Blue Origin and NASA have to overcome for an eventual Mars mission. We are decades away from that unless NASAs budget is increased exponentially.