I love space. My middle is fascinated by it. My dad served with 4 Star Retired Kevin Chilton (not to get him in trouble but he is like minded with Conservatives) who headed Space Command and went on STS 49 (pilot)/STS 59 (pilot)/STS 76 Commander. My daughter has a signed picture from him and might follow that route in life. That said. I still fail to see the need to go to Mars. Now Space is different…
IMO, there's no good reason to go to Mars. We can do most scientific research with probes at a fraction of the cost. It would cost trillions of dollars to establish a human presence and one that would always teeter on the edge of a complete loss of life to the colony by storms or earthquakes and such. And, for what exactly?
Went to Space Camp in Huntsville, AL as a kid. Was right after the movie came out. It was pretty cool from what I can remember.
define reasonable there are some zealots with potential credentials that would fly under less standards than what nasa used to accept. with doge in charge, who knows if there are safety standards anymore but tesla is building robots so..
Huntsville is in Al because Texas was too hot and flat for the German scientists and the liked the rolling hills and weather there better
SpaceX would have run out of money and folded onto itself without government hand outs of just shy of $20B, $14B from NASA and another $5.5 from the Defense Department. The tax payers have received ZERO return on the investment. The epitome of Waste and Fraud.
Part of the plan is to send landers with equipment first and to mine the materials for the return trip on site. Also current engines don’t burn fuel the whole way there mostly just on take off. Then the rocket coasts to Mars(actually once you get caught by the Martian gravity it pulls you there). 3D printers will print new parts as needed. I’d bet we send a manned ship by 2040.
That’s just silly and I detest Elon. SpaceX has worked wonders under Gwynne Shotwell and regularly performs NASA missions for cheaper than its competitors and Russia. In other words, those are not “hand outs” but fairly compensated contracts performing a service for the government.
Define Gov “handouts”. SpaceX is being paid just like any other contractor to furnish products and services to NASA, this includes much of the lift capacity used since the shuttle was decommissioned. Would you rather pay Russia more to do the same thing? Didn’t realize you preferred Putin over a US company.
It’s designed to be capable but still needs to be proven out. First step is to simply get it to hold together. The plan is to launch several Starships into orbit at a SpaceX cost of ~$10M each to refuel another Starship and send it to Mars. It calcs out but, as I said above, they have to prove the theoretical.
At this point I think the trip to Mars to establish a colony is a one way mission but I could be wrong.
The government has had astronauts delivered and returned from the ISS as well as numerous resupply missions. All done much cheaper than the Russians would have done it for us.
Certainly no one should go expecting to come back. The launch window is every 26 months with another 8 month transit time each way. So you’re talking nearly 3 years if everything goes perfectly smoothly and they make the first available launch window back to Earth (8 months transit + 18 months on Mars + 8 months transit back).
You have to burn fuel to land on Mars and nining Mars for fuel is just a theory. We don't have the technology. If the plan was to land by 2040 there would have already been a plan proposed with an estimated budget. Space probes take at least 15 years of planning with a much smaller budget. We're talking about at least a trillion dollars for a human Mars mission because we have to keep those people alive on Mars for well over a year and we have no way to protect them from radiation. The mission is decades away...if ever
We already know there is CO2 and H2O Mars the main ingredients to make rocket fuel. As far as radiation that’s easy, underground habitats. If we want to we can do it.