Are Nukes Actually Real ?

Answer to the question posed in the title of this thread.
I wouldn't want to find out.

 

Radioactive viruses

 

Maybe you are just confused as to what you perceive the understanding to be from Hollywood? His observations are not remotely surprising other than both simultaneously speculating about conspiracy theories about whether the bomb actually existed. The main debate in nuclear weapons impacts seems to be climate related (what happens when radiation is in the atmosphere) and that is because modeling has not yet conquered the complexities of our environment.

https://www.acq.osd.mil/ncbdp/nm/NMHB2020rev/chapters/chapter13.html

 

Head down to the Marshall Islands and tell them your takes on nuclear radiation. I'm sure they will be interested

 

All I know is my Grandad was a missionary after the war. He went back to Japan to help the people. He said the effects were devastating both physically and mentally. And he wasn’t even in the epicenter. It was closer to Tokyo. He stayed a number of years. My Mom was actually born there.

 

No

 

I’m surrounded by dumbasses with no sense of humor.

 

Algorithm training is a biatch

 

The bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were air bursts. The fireballs didn't touch the ground or the water. There was little residual radiation and fallout. Compare to all of the tests in the Pacific which were ground and underwater bursts and it makes a hell of a difference. It would have been necessary to evacuate all survivors from the cities for decades if those bombs had exploded on the ground because the fireballs would have left a smoking crater loaded with the same radioactivity that the fallout carried away. I would venture a guess that sea life did not fare so well after the Operation Crossroads underwater test because the floor of the ocean there would have been blasted with radiation.

 

this thread has “Florida man” all over it

 

Give you $100 to go down to the hospital basement in Pripyat in your boxers