Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Trump’s No Good Awful Very Bad Choice …

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by duggers_dad, Feb 8, 2025.

Page 2 of 2
  1. Feb 9, 2025 #21
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,166
    1,296
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Not that this is Christianity.
     
  2. Feb 9, 2025 #22
    slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    3,802
    835
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    You failed the SAT analogy. Good try.
     
  3. Feb 9, 2025 #23
    insuragator

    insuragator VIP Member

    18,814
    624
    643
    Apr 3, 2007
    OK - I generally disagree with every thing you post but that shit was funny. I am still crying laughing. Well played sir.
     
  4. Feb 9, 2025 #24
    PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    8,505
    904
    558
    Apr 13, 2007

    Oh so many evangelical leaders are displeased with THIS nomination. It’s ironic, for an issue they are experts, they deem her as a bad choice. They should know other cabinet appointments were similarly just as bad and now in positions of power and extremely important to our country.
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2025
  5. Feb 9, 2025 #25
    docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    6,290
    1,947
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    What happened to cracking down on an anti Christian bias?
     
  6. Feb 9, 2025 #26
    channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,717
    2,192
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Once they finish tracking down the WMDs in Iraq they'll move on to anti-christian bias
     
  7. Feb 9, 2025 #27
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,166
    1,296
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Admittedly, a little sloppy. Slaveholders weren’t slaughtering upwards of a million human beings a year. Slaves were an essential means of production.
     
  8. Feb 9, 2025 #28
    108

    108 Premium Member

    18,269
    1,251
    1,313
    Apr 3, 2007
    NYC
    if you had the option of saving one living baby in a fire or 365,000 fetuses, what would you choose?
     
  9. Feb 9, 2025 #29
    g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    128,263
    58,939
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    I would do my level best to save both
     
  10. Feb 9, 2025 #30
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,166
    1,296
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    You’re living in 1857 …

    If there was a fire would you save the person or the three-fifths a person ?
     
Page 2 of 2