Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Trump's Tax Plan will widen Social Security Shortfall

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by gator95, Oct 21, 2024.

  1. thomadm

    thomadm VIP Member

    3,001
    716
    2,088
    Apr 9, 2007
    SS is fine. These predictions of doom and gloom are funny, as people have been bringing the SS is broken crap since it was passed.

    We will do what we always do, run a deficit. SS taxes will be paid by inflation through the Fed like everything else.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  2. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    25,600
    2,755
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    It should be illegal to be that stupid.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,906
    870
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    How about both? Even if you cap donations, I don't trust either side to not play dirty.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    6,300
    572
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
    Agreed, but if there is no money to milk (or revolving doors, etc.) then there is nothing to extract. I don't think they go there with the intent to corrupt themselves, but it is literally part of the game. If you don't fundraise to a certain level - both for yourself and the party - the party will abandon you.
     
  5. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,906
    870
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    I don't believe that there is "nothing to extract". Both sides will find ways to get money. Both sides won't let that happen.
     
  6. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    6,300
    572
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
    One side is getting money - almost exclusively to fund their campaign - the other is giving money in an effort to buy policy. If there is no money to get, there is nothing to extract. Are we assuming that every person who runs for office does so for the graft?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,906
    870
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    Well, if there are term limits, maybe our "leaders" will actually try to accomplish something besides getting re-elected and making money. I'd love to be able to insider trade like Congress gets to.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,906
    870
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    You really think that either side let's that happen? These entities will then find a way to use bots to funnel the money. Never underestimate Congress's power to make money for themselves.
     
  9. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,693
    13,320
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Yeah, on second thought I am thrilled that instead of seeing any of it back, that it goes to line the pockets of the fatcat donor class. :rolleyes:
     
  10. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    6,300
    572
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
    Or, if they don't have to build campaign war chests every two years, maybe they could just do that anyway. Chicken and egg, but IMO, the money/purchase of policy is the biggest barrier to "accomplishing something".
     
  11. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    6,300
    572
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
    Or corporate America's power to buy policy, by most measures, bad policy for average Americans.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,906
    870
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    Agree 100%. Just don't think they will put the toothpaste back in the tube. Also don't think term limits will happen, because that would require Congress approving that LOL short of a Constitutional Amendment. We are stuck with both sides making a killing and taking kickbacks and legally doing insider trading.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,539
    245
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    There is likely going to have to be some means testing as well. Lot of fighting about how to do it but if we are going to get serious about reforms, a sliding scale on how much wealthier Americans receive will be part of the negotiations.
     
  14. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    89,306
    26,928
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    Not even close to the same thing. Is car insurance like a pension plan that you pay money all your working life into?

    Try working on your analogies...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  15. pogba

    pogba Senior

    296
    81
    1,768
    Nov 28, 2013
    The people who are contributing to social security are subsidizing the disabled, elderly and those in poverty. This is how a society works. You can't "opt out" of paying for this.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  16. pogba

    pogba Senior

    296
    81
    1,768
    Nov 28, 2013
    Social security is, at it's heart, insurance against starving to death. "In the United States, Social Security is the commonly used term for the federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI)"

    A society will always have to provide for those in poverty. If you can't see the need to pay for old folks to survive who outlive their savings for instance, you are an evil person.
     
  17. pogba

    pogba Senior

    296
    81
    1,768
    Nov 28, 2013
    What does that even mean
     
  18. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,186
    2,649
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    You’re $30T in debt. You saved nothing. You paid nothing in. I am paying for your luxury and will for decades.
     
  19. gatorjd95

    gatorjd95 GC Legend

    664
    119
    263
    Mar 6, 2009
    Sure you "can." Before/in place of gov't, people/society cared for the disabled, elderly, and poor through family, community, and charity. Gov't does not hold a patent on "welfare." The issue is not whether a decent society cares for those in need - the question is what is the more efficient and fair platform to do so. For me, I believe more in the goodness of the people than I do a federal bureaucracy - with acknowledgment that a mixture of both is probably necessary.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,533
    1,630
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    This is what SS is supposed to be a safety net. Instead fdr created the first major disaster for future generations. We will be gone by the time it really hits our future generations. But very few would have a problem with this. We could cut FICA taxes back to close to their original amount (probably not quite all the way as there have been changes that would have dictated some increases to as the economy changed).

    SS started at 1% for the employee and 1% for the employer on a max taxable of $3K. It stayed that way for 12 years (max taxable longer). We now tax at 6.2 times the amount on a max taxable that is more than double what inflation would have it be.

    We need to get back to around 3% on a max taxable of around $100K if I were guessing on numbers. With that we need to take care of the disabled and those without the means to take care of themselves. SS should not be something one wants to get. It should be something to protect one if needed. An actual security blanket. Not an extra vacation or two because one paid into it.

    It will take time (decades) to get it where it should be. But sadly it will not happen because too many people (majority dem and pub) view it like it appears you do. Something you are owed. This is the reason fdr is in the argument for worst president ever!

    ***One of the major factors in the destruction of the family unit can be traced to SS imo...people relying on government instead of family***