This is the TicTok era. Just imagine the vapidity of what comes next. No they won't! That kind of embarrassment (that requires actual gray matter) is dead.
Not sure the R talk show/podcast circuit has come up with an official name for Kamala, so he winged it. Hildabeast was well established for decades, I think by Rush Limbaugh back in the 90s.
Must be entirely untrue then. All 20+ women. Even the part about the 9-person jury finding him liable of sexual assault. Also, he didn't admit to committing sexual assault on tape. Because......Wikipedia can be edited.
I don't really understand your post. I do understand that you support a rapist. One that admitted to sexually assaulting women on tape. That has been accused of such by appx 27 women. Who publicly stated that he liked to troll through pageant dressing rooms to look at minors while they were dressing. (And has been noted to have done so by said minors.) One who was found liable of sexual assault when the evidence was put in front of a jury. You must be so proud. But hey - you can pretend none of that is true because....well, Wikipedia can be edited.
Don't know if Lutnick is corrupt or guilty of anything. The SEC Chair Gary Gensler has a reputation for being highly partisan. Here's a video of JD Vance questioning him duck://player/DKCAU-NvX9k
If the 25th amendment hasn’t been invoked over the last 47 months then it most likely will never need to be.
That doesn’t matter. Jo will never let facts, evidence(or lack of), reason or logic get in the way of his emotional rants. Who has the pleasure of having your smiling face at their house for Christmas dinner this year Jo? I’ll bet they just can’t wait for that day. The children opening their presents can’t hold a candle to the joy of having Uncle Jo over.
This poster's responce to Jo's assertion of "facts, evidence(or lack of), reason or logic" that is referenced in Jo's post and further attributed by VAg8tr1 's post :"I would add that there are 238 footnotes in the Wikipedia article cited by @gator_jo. Seems to be rather extensive and probably mostly attribution from credible sources." is simply to disparage the conclusion without bringing any contrary evidence ( the very defintion of an emotional rant) and then take a personal swipe. Tantamount to an embarrassing 10 yr old's argument and unhelpful. Just be better.
Sorry but yours, Jo’s, VA’s and the rest of your ilk’s credibility to determine and call credibility was permanently ruined a few years back when you claimed that The Nutty Professor who accused a respected Supreme Court nominee of an attempted rape decades earlier yet couldn’t recall the when, where, or who else was at the supposed party was highly credible. And there’s nothing embarrassing about taking a swipe at Jo. He deserves mine and many more. As for your swipe at me, go sit down until you can play with the big boys. Maybe you could spend the time figuring out credible does not mean “ooh ooh, that sounds good to me”. You libs never find the bottom, do you?
Emotional rant? The other poster said it already, and probably better, but; ... what kind of factless embracer of ignorance brings forth no facts, but disregards the potential merits of an issue, in totality, because...... (LOL).....Wikipedia can be edited? Wait, don't answer; the defender of an adjudicated sexual assaulter, and probable rapist, who wants to ignore that reality. And since you crafted a witty holiday scene to make your point, I think I'll do the same : Here's AgingGator during the holidays, while hanging his ornament of Donald Trump on the tree : "Hey kids, this guy is my political hero and I shill for him regularly! He's cheated on all three of his wives, banged porn stars, been accused of sexual assault or rape by about 27 women, admitted to grabbing women's genitals without their permission, and been adjudicated by a jury in court of sexual assault! He's the best!! Merry Christmas!!!"
Poor Jo, the only thing he’s worse at than political debate is personal insults. I think George Costanza’s “well the jerk store called, and they’re out of you” was better than some of yours.
Ever notice that that guy is like my personal stalker? Get's all emotionally distraught when someone posts something bad about Trump, such as the approximately 27 credible allegations of sexual assault......then he unloads his sad personal insults? It's more amusing than annoying, tbh. But there's a clear pattern.
