Inaugurate him as President however many times you want - it will not make any difference. Donald J Trump is a lying adulterer who has cheated on every wife he's had, has admitted to being and been adjudicated a sexual assaulter, and has been found guilty of 34 felonies, while being shielded from trial on appx 60 other ones by a corrupt judiciary. He also enacted a criminal conspiracy to overturn an election, and is the ONLY president in US history to attempt to not peacefully transfer power. In the future, people will be embarrassed if forced to admit that friends or family voted for such a vile, traitorous, amoral subhuman.
I am proud of my vote and everyone who lives in my neighborhood knows who I voted for and would vote for again over the bimbo(and that is way to kind of a description of her) you supported
If the Democrats regain their majority in the House following a likely Blue wave in 2026 Trump could very well be impeached again. On the other hand like the first two it will be an exercise in futility since there is no way that he would be convicted and removed from office by the Senate. The chances are the Pubs will hold their Senate majority in 2026 and even if they lose it there is virtually no way that 2/3 of the Senate would vote to convict the Orange God.
The chances are the Pubs will hold their Senate majority in 2026 and even if they lose it there is virtually no way that 2/3 of the Senate would vote to convict the Orange God.--exactly.
Are people rejecting CNBC now? The boring news channel people watch/read to get non-made up market news so they don't accidentally invest in magic beans?
LOL. He's a sexual assaulter to be proud of!! Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia Jill Harth alleged that Trump assaulted her several times. Harth has stated that in December 1992, while dining with Trump and her then-boyfriend George Houraney, Trump attempted to put his hands between her legs.[20] After she became engaged, Harth alleges, Trump began to stalk her.[31] In April 2016, an anonymous woman using the pseudonym "Katie Johnson" filed a lawsuit in California accusing both Trump and Jeffrey Epstein of forcibly raping her when she was 13 years old at underage sex parties at Epstein's Manhattan residence in 1994.[49][50] The case was dismissed the following month. A second version of the lawsuit was filed in New York in June by the same woman as "Jane Doe" claiming to have been raped or sexually assaulted by the pair at four 1994 parties when she was 13. On May 9, after deliberating for less than three hours, a jury of six men and three women in Manhattan federal court unanimously found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll and defaming her by calling her a liar... Zervos has said that Trump was sexually suggestive during their meeting, kissing her open-mouthed, groping her breasts,[81] and thrusting his genitals on her.[83] She also said that his behavior was aggressive and not consensual. Read the rest at the link above
thanks for the heads up Cut him some slack Neal Boortz is retired and he’s having to come up with these on his own.
Bill's and other members of the MAGA Cult must have ignored their parents' admonition, "USE YOUR BRAIN!". It's sad seeing a fellow member of our species behaving in such fashion.
I'm surprised that no Trump supporters want to comment on this. Are all these (20+ accusations) in the posted article just "locker room talk"? Particularly when paired with his direct comment that he grabs women by their genitals without consent? Is this very clear pattern of sexual assault simply acceptable to Trump voters?
So, this means they made at least 60M in profit from the malfeasance. I think that's pretty much the way fines work with the SEC and Wall St. Penalty will be 10% of the gross revenue secured by the fraud. Yep. That sounds about right.
When I read an article on Wikipedia I check the attribution and footnotes. The most unreliable articles tend to be biographies of public figures especially politicians. It's my understanding that almost every member of Congress has a staff person whose job it is to routinely check Wikipedia and to remove unflattering comments regarding the member. Again the credibility of the piece depends on the attribution. I would add that there are 238 footnotes in the Wikipedia article cited by @gator_jo. Seems to be rather extensive and probably mostly attribution from credible sources.
Yep, let the good times roll. 0% inflation. 0% interest rates. Anything less and I fully expect MAGA to demand answers. . . Oh wait. . .
Not to mention, impeachment is dead. Just a cheap political tool now. One to be reflexively used against the other party for no other reason than to make their term more difficult. Both parties own this and they're both pathetic for allowing it to come to this.
