Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Trump translation please: Get rid of popular vote

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by citygator, Dec 9, 2024.

  1. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    I am not sure what is going on here. A 1:00 am post that might as well say “covfefe”. Is Donald actually fit for office?

    cc488e20-b2f9-4118-b407-4a85ed8e3bb1.jpg
     
    • Funny Funny x 7
  2. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Yeah, I hope some of our MAGAs can come along and translate that for us.
     
  3. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,872
    1,360
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    At least as of today 100% of MAGA hates the electoral college and wants to use the popular vote… I guess that’s good….
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 3
  4. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    14,357
    22,654
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    I believe the Democrats would go along with this.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  5. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,670
    1,793
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    He just babbles
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  6. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,387
    55,073
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    [​IMG]
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. Donzo

    Donzo GC Hall of Fame

    1,630
    508
    298
    May 20, 2008
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Is he trying to be ironically funny?
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  9. PetrolGator

    PetrolGator Lawful Neutral Premium Member

    I would. The EV’s main intended purpose was vaporware after the South got its ass handed to it in 1865.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  10. Donzo

    Donzo GC Hall of Fame

    1,630
    508
    298
    May 20, 2008
    No.

    The Founding Fathers established it in the Constitution.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Hall of Fame

    1,879
    247
    193
    Aug 9, 2024
    "They're eating the electoral college!" ??
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  12. PetrolGator

    PetrolGator Lawful Neutral Premium Member

    ….and why did they do that? I didn’t say the Civil War caused it; I said it eliminated one of the primary reasons that the EC even exists.

    I’ll spell it out for you: slave states worried that other states with more white, property-owning males would out-vote them. The EC allowed for overall population (and in certain cases, 3/5 of a person,) to count toward overall Electors. ;)
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,267
    1,911
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Nah, it was dead even before the civil war once states starting going to a popular vote to award electors. The "original" Constitutional intent died in less than half a century. By the 1830s there was only one state that had their legislature appoint electors.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. Donzo

    Donzo GC Hall of Fame

    1,630
    508
    298
    May 20, 2008
    Nope again. Your spelling out sucks.

    It had nada to do with the Civil War or 1865. It was created four score and a couple years prior to "1865". And, it had a lot more to do with farmers in all states not named Pennsylvania and New York.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  15. PetrolGator

    PetrolGator Lawful Neutral Premium Member

    I’m not referring to the states’ Electorial Colleges themselves; I’m referring to why the system was put into place.

    Popular vote, in the eyes of the slave holding states, would substantially put them at a disadvantage in POTUS elections. This isn’t a “because racism” post. Their math and intent aren’t unreasonable when you have a far smaller population of eligible voters.

    It’s the same reason we had the 3/5 compromise: slave states wanted their entire population to count toward both the EC and House seats. Non-slave states understandably balked. It diluted their own power.

    EC only got worse when we froze the number of seats in the House via the Reapportionment Act.

    I fail to see why abolishing the EC isn’t a good idea.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,267
    1,911
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Had nothing to do with that either. All states had farmers lol. There weren't massive cities then or a big urban/rural divide, this was pre-industrial America. They just didnt want a popular vote to elect the president, that's all. And states started using the popular vote to appoint electors less than 30 years after the ink was dry and the Constitutional intent basically went up in smoke. All other explanations are just backwards justifications. The EC stopped operating the way it was conceived in the 1820s!
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2024
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. PetrolGator

    PetrolGator Lawful Neutral Premium Member

    Sigh.

    The Electoral vote is specifically based on population. It provided outsized influence for slave-owning states’ eligible voters.

    Madison himself objected to a direct, population-based POTUS election with:

    “The right of suffrage was more diffuse in the Northern than the Southern States; and the latter could have no influence in the election on the score of Negroes.”

    In other words, in a direct election, the Northern voters would outnumber the South. It was simply a matter of political power. Note that Madison was a key architect of the EC.
     
  18. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Right now the election caters to a small group of people in very few states. Trump is right. Lets get rid of the electoral vote system.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  19. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    126,229
    57,619
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    I am Maga and do not think we should ever get rid of the EC
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  20. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,872
    1,360
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Then you are a MINO, Maga In Name Only ...
     
    • Funny x 4
    • Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner x 1
    • Best Post Ever x 1