Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Trump names Pam Bondi for AG

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by g8orbill, Nov 21, 2024 at 7:36 PM.

  1. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,174
    1,329
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Isn't the IC going to be an issue for anyone Trump puts in there? I mean, if there is one cabinet position that will encounter the most delay, stall and obfuscation, it's going to be Trump's AG.
     
  2. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,174
    1,329
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    It could be that Gaetz was seen as a sacrificial lamb. Trump had Bondi lined up and ready to go.. I believe he announced her in less than 24 hours after Gaetz withdrew. By sacrificing Gaetz, Trump can ask for more grace on another pick like RFK, for example. Not sure what is going to become of Hegseth.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,075
    2,607
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    I don’t buy that for a second. If that was truly his chess move, the better play would’ve been to have Gaetz fail at the nomination, and then “compromise” by withdrawing Gaetz. As it stands, there was no “deal” other than by the House to not release the release its report, something supported by the timing of the stalemated vote and his withdrawal of the name. If that was truly Trump’s chess move, he payed it terribly and wasted the opportunity.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    88,149
    26,486
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    People wonder why he's giving up these names so early in the process, just to see the Leftists can rail against the picks for weeks to come.

    He's smoking out the rats... :eek::D;)

    And it's working.
     
  5. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    24,976
    2,628
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    My first GF at UF was a 3D from Miami. Blonde hair, blue eyes, very well assembled. Left me for some Iranian guy while I was home recovering from an appendectomy,...broke my heart.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  6. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    24,976
    2,628
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    One of the biggest rats just removed his name from consideration to be AG.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    5,767
    508
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
    This is why Gaetz feels like a straight-up troll. No real thought other than, "Watch the libs go crazy!"

    Even if you believe the most diabolical scenarios Trump has for AG, Bondi is a far better (and more legitimate and credible) person to do that given her resume and and experience in executive positions. Gaetz was always going to be a clown that nobody outside of MAGA world took seriously and, in that respect, would be far less effective in implementing those diabolical plans.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. antny1

    antny1 GC Hall of Fame

    5,125
    2,657
    2,498
    Dec 3, 2019
    Tri Delta...everyone else has and tri Delta fly the friendly thighs were the two slogans people used to joke about in the mid 90s when I was there. That came from other girls moreso than guys before anyone throws out the ole sexist charge.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,372
    14,412
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    What opportunity did he miss?
     
  10. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,009
    1,743
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    I will say this about Pam Bondi. Although I have a lot of problems with her unlike Matt Gaetz lack of qualifications is not one of them. Trump's first nominee for AG was perhaps the least qualified person for that position in the history of the Republic, Pam Bondi on the other hand is very well qualified. Interestingly, Trump considered her as his AG after he was elected in 2016 but decided not to nominate her based on the possibility that she could have problems with confirmation stemming from her decision to drop the case against Trump University after receiving a large campaign contribution. The fact that she should sail through the Senate this time around demonstrates how much the ethical standards for cabinet level nominations from Trump have dropped in the last eight years and how subservient Republican politicians and specifically senators are to Donald Trump.
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2024 at 12:31 PM
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    I get that sentiment. I also think we...on my side and your side...need to hope some good, decent people are willing to work for him. (Mike Pence). Otherwise there isnt an ounce of accountability.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    That's so funny.
    Competent and MSNBC hates her.

    That's a win.
     
  13. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,013
    2,118
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    This is an overwhelmingly better nominee than Gaetz.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    7,166
    1,086
    2,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    This makes no sense
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,009
    1,743
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    I would agree that there is no doubt as to her competence although being competent and well qualified doesn't necessarily mean that she will be ethical. She could still use the power of the DOJ to prosecute Trump's real and perceived political opponents and her authority as the AG to purge career attorneys and other employees of the DOJ and FBI who have been involved in the investigations and prosecutions of Trump.
     
  16. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,174
    1,329
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    No, I think Trump saved time and egg on face by having Gaetz withdraw now. The Senate made it clear Gaetz's confirmation was going to be problematic. The dye had already been cast. No use in wasting everyone's time trying to get a cabinet appointee through the Senate when everybody knows it's a losing effort. Trump still retains the "you shot down my nominee" card. The fact Gaetz didn't have formal hearings is probably better in this regard for Trump, because the Senate would have been exasperated at Trump by that point that he wasted their time on something he knew wasn't going to fly.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  17. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,075
    2,607
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    The argument I was responding said that Trump planned the bait and switch the whole time (Gaetz for Bondi). If that was truly the case, he should’ve waited until the confirmation hearings. Then, he could said he’ll withdrawn Gaetz and replace him with Bondi in return for ….

    If it was all part of a grand plan, he missed the opportunity to play out the hand and get his “in return for …”.

    That’s why I pushed back on the “chess move” argument.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  18. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    123,383
    163,991
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Trump and his advisors had to know this was going to be difficult. I think that is why
    "recess appointments" were mentioned. Gaetz was the sacrificial lamb. His withdrawal will help ease everyone else through, not there won't be some fights over a few of them. RFK and Hegseth to name a few.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  19. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,013
    2,118
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    I think RFK, Jr. will make it to the hearings, but Hegseth won't.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  20. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    24,976
    2,628
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    Trump's charitable organization was fined over that donation. It apparently didn't occur to them that charities can't contribute to political causes.