They'll use it as an excuse to give them extra time to generate votes. You know some dem judge will let them do it.
seems unlikely I'm taking bets in another thread... do you want to put some money on this ridiculous assertion as well?
You don't think the dems are preparing to cheat this time? What do you think about the Nevada courts saying unpostmarked ballots received late can be counted?
Got any evidence of that? (Didn't think so.) On the other hand, there's plenty of evidence of Trump and Trumppublicans not just cheating, but criminally trying to overturn an election. Always amusing to see MAGAts trying to project their cheating and criminality onto others....
A ballot received within three days with an indeterminate postmark could already be counted, so while I agree with the concurrence personally (that the RNC didn't have standing but that the statute plainly requires a postmark of some kind) I don't see this as a likely mechanism of "cheating" given that we are talking about an infinitesimally small number of ballots. If after the election a huge number of unpostmarked ballots are counted and swing the result then I will agree with you that Nevada was stolen. also since the judges are non-partisan I'm not sure how it would be "the Democrats" stealing anything