Trump campaign speaker excitedly calls for "civil war" if Republicans lose the election

I’m a libertarian that voted for Biden. I personally don’t really care what odd sexual preferences politicians have, just pointing out the factually incorrect statement made about Clinton’s lack of affairs.

 

Back on topic, but Thiel is starting to seem to be a very sketchy figure. His quote on freedom and democracy no longer being compatible is terrifying. He was a conservative libertarian (which is what I mostly believe) until he became a hard core economic nationalist. He is too smart and too experienced to think that economic nationalism will actually help the country in today’s global world.

 

At that point for Bill in 1996 vs what was known about Trump at the same date in 2016 is simply a false equivalence. Full stop.

 

I’m really tired of politicians calling for violence. I would argue that most of the maga people I know are no where close to wanting to shoot their liberal neighbors nor do liberal neighbors have any devious designs on the country. Almost everyone just wants to go about their business make some money raise their kids pay their taxes watch some sports/tv hang with friends and be left in peace. I know that some republican politicians think this is a winning strategy but it’s really not. Someone is going to get hurt over stupid shit.

 

Considering that you went so far as to post the damn definition of "serial", I'm going to go ahead and point out that thus far you have failed miserably.

Shamelessly, in fact, considering that you post the date K Willey alleges abuse occurred.....but try to sneak past a reader that her allegations were actually made in 1998, five years later.

So our information thus far confirms precisely what I said : when votes were cast in 1996 there was no known or accepted evidence that Bill Clinton was a serial adulterer. Other than the one individual he and Hillary publicly revealed, there appears to have been a SINGLE accusation made....which he denies to this day.

Be better.

 

Jennifer Flowers c

Jennifer Flowers came forward in 1992. Paula Jones in 1994.

Everyone knew he cheated on Hillary numerous times before 1996. Why are you even trying to argue this?

 

Lol. If you think Clinton never assaulted any women you can turn in your MeToo card.

Perjury. Yes.
Serial Adulterer. Yes.

Now to be clear. I'm not saying he is the same. I'm saying people think all politicians are frauds so they vote for their own side regardless.

 

Weird that people can't follow. It was clearly written. Certainly haven't disproved this :

So our information thus far confirms precisely what I said : when votes were cast in 1996 there was no known or accepted evidence that Bill Clinton was a serial adulterer.

 

Out of how many millions who voted for Trump in 2020?
Over 73 million is that answer.

 

And the rest of the 73 million are rilly rilly opposed to Trump's criminal conspiracy to overturn an election, and his happily watching while 100s of cops were beaten. That's why they're almost entirely voting for him again.

Right?

 

Paula Jones accuses Bill Clinton of sexual harassment | May 6, 1994 | HISTORY

Clinton Lied in Denying Affair, Woman Insists : Rebuttal: Gennifer Flowers offers tapes as proof of a liaison. She refuses to discuss apparent discrepancies in her story.

A Psychiatrist Breaks Down the Top Signs of a Serial Cheater.

How many sources do you need? Cheating on your wife with one women for 12 years makes you a serial adulterer. A second women adds to that. All public before 1996. We aren’t debating politics, you are just being obtuse.

 

Since I’m not voting for him I can only guess why they are again.
From what I have heard here some are the reasons:
They don’t like liberal policies.
They don’t want higher and higher taxes.
They don’t want effectively open borders “just claim asylum and you’re in”.
They thought Biden was completely lost.
Some truly believe there was a lot of ballot stuffing in 2020..

 

You are talking to a wall on this one. Everybody knew Clinton was a philanderer from his time as Gov of Arkansas.
The poster is either purposely being obtuse or wasn’t old enough to be paying attention at that time.
His complete obsessive hate of Trump and Pubs in general is almost pathological at this point.

 

Were his own words evidence?

He literally admitted it in a 60 Minutes interview in 1992. He was being asked about infidelity and said this:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pjones/stories/pj012792.htm

The Paula Jones stuff while certainly debatable was public in 1994:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pjones/stories/pj012792.htm

 

I just provided the link from 1992 where he admitted it himself.

 

Weird that the word "serial" seems so elusive.

 

Maybe you want to make a run at it - Cluck went so far as to look up and post the definition of "serial" before totally failing to demonstrate that in 1996 Bill Clinton was considered a "serial adulterer."

After all, the original comparison was to Trump and casting votes for a person so flawed.

Yes, Clinton admitted to an affair with G Flowers. Clinton was accused and denied allegations wrt P Jones. As far as i know, and has been shown here, that is ALL that was publicly known or alleged. Hardly "serial", no?

Maybe you need to re-read that definition that was so helpfully posted.

At this point, there's no reason for discussion, and the only comment is your total and utter lack of ability to either comprehend or follow this discussion. Or both.

 

More than one, big fella. Even if there's also a denied and then (still?) unsubstantiated accusation as well.

I'm pretty sure most people don't consider someone who had an affair a "serial" adulterer. In fact, go check the definition you posted but either didn't read or don't comprehend.

At this point you're just being obtuse. Wait, cancel that - maybe you genuinely just don't know what "serial" means. Who knows.

 

Well at least this time it was wasn’t your typical cut and paste schtick about Trump.

Your definition of serial reminds me of Clinton commenting on the definition of “is”.

Carry on Truman.

 

I'm sorry you're unable to comprehend the discussion. It's kind of sad. Maybe you shouldn't involve yourself in what you don't understand?

But to compare the known behavior of Clinton in 96 to that of Trump is absurd.

I'm sure you'll find a way to falsely equate the two, in your typical fashion of constantly shilling for the rapist criminal while also pretending to be independent.