Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

California's Well Mocked and Pathetic High Speed Rail

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by louisianagatormom, Jun 11, 2024.

  1. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,252
    1,661
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Country is too big to make it cost effective. Very few areas with the population density to make it worthwhile. The northeast makes sense. LA to San Diego probably makes sense. San Franscisco to Sacramento would work. Cincinatti to Columbus to Cleveland might work. Miami to Orlando is good only because their is so much growth up the coast, it is really only Cocoa to Orlando that is HSR. Orlando to Tampa is good. Dallas and Houston may be stretching a little bit. Maybe Portland to Seattle. And that is really about it. Everything else is too far apart to make that kind of investment worth it.

    I love rail. Have some fond memories of traveling by train when I was younger. Wanted to take the kids on a trip, so they could have similar memories, the cost was going to be more than double what it would be to fly. They weren't that good of memories :)
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    28,430
    1,637
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    I think people do forget how compact and dense Europe is. In America we really should be looking at how to make cities and dense suburbs more walkable, bikeable and reducing the need to drive in other ways. But even in NYC you have Hochul killing congestion pricing for really bad reasons (i.e. not pissing off rich people and non New Yorkers). Unbelievably bad politics on her part.
     
  3. jeffbrig

    jeffbrig GC Hall of Fame

    1,323
    466
    1,948
    Aug 7, 2007
    Not to mention, when you go to Europe, the train stations are in/near the city centers. You can take a train somewhere, and you don't need a car when you get there. When staying in London, we've done day trips to other cities - York, Dover, etc., where we just got off the train and spent the day sightseeing - no cars.

    As much as I prefer taking the Brightline (FLL to Orlando) over fighting Turnpike traffic, you still need a car to get anywhere once you reach MCO. Uber, rental car, or someone to pick you up.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  4. jeffbrig

    jeffbrig GC Hall of Fame

    1,323
    466
    1,948
    Aug 7, 2007
    Not defending this particular project as a whole, but that $11B floating around is nonsense.

    No, one high-speed rail bridge didn't cost $11 billion | Fact check
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise GC Hall of Fame

    14,706
    25,791
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    Brightline might make a little sense now but it won't in the future. There are already talks in the works to add more stops on the route which would make the trip longer and defeat the purpose of HSR. They are adding stops in Stuart and Cocoa. This will make eight stops. They will probably add more. Making the HSR nothing more than an Amtrak.

    Miami to W Palm takes 2 hrs and Miami to Orlando takes 3 1/2 hrs. Adding the two new stops and now that trip is going to be over 4 hrs.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2024
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. archigator_96

    archigator_96 GC Hall of Fame

    3,331
    3,432
    1,923
    Apr 8, 2020
    Yep, our city centers have, guess what, parking garages in them. (other than the older cities in the NE and San Fran).
     
  7. jeffbrig

    jeffbrig GC Hall of Fame

    1,323
    466
    1,948
    Aug 7, 2007
    It's usually about 2:50 from FLL to MCO on the train, which is the one I'm taking. So for ~3 hours, I can sit back in comfort, enjoy an adult beverage, browse on my phone/laptop. Or, I can spend 3-3.5 hours (sometimes more) fighting with idiot drivers on the turnpike. If I take the train, I arrive relaxed and MUCH fresher.

    The stops themselves are very brief, 2-3 mins, not 15 mins each. Not every train stops at every station either. I'm not really worried about new stations impacting the schedule significantly.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  8. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise GC Hall of Fame

    14,706
    25,791
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    I got my info off the bright line website
     
  9. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    15,026
    5,255
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    I took the Brightline for the first time today. Was supposed to take it from Orlando to Miami. Instead, due to the flooding, I got dumped out in Aventura and then had to go through hell trying to get to my hotel in Miami. Not a good start. Yeah, can't control mother nature, but it still wasn't handled well.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  10. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    12,506
    1,561
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    Even China does not have HSR to all sides and corners of the country. They have HSR between the population centers on the east coast. And their population centers are much more populated than ours. New York City would be a medium-sized city in China, surpassed in population by all of the large cities, often by a factor of three.

    Another thing that China had in their favor is that their economy developed rapidly and recently. It is much easier to build your city around the HSR station and tracks if you build it early in the development of the city, and not 50-100 years later. You do not have to tear down nearly as many buildings and re-route roads, sewer mains, and everything else. And you do not have as much uproar with all of the eminent domain land acquisition that has to happen.

    Washington, D.C. to New York would be the one HSR route that is desperately needed (most crowded air corridor in the world). It would be expensive, but worth it. Work out the problems, then expand to Boston in one direction, and Chicago in the other. Put a tax of a few cents a gallon on gasoline to pay for it (HSR will reduce gasoline usage). It could be built over a period of 30-40 years.
     
  11. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    23,753
    2,356
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
     
  12. louisianagatormom

    louisianagatormom Junior

    105
    16
    58
    May 31, 2024
    Thank you for proving my point. Your own article says it clear, the state is only holding room on I-4 (either going down the median or other land around I-4) and is not doing any of the grants.

    Even if the State of Florida does help a little bit with the grants and construction costs, Brightline would still be responsible for most of the cost. And here's the most important part, once operation starts Brightline is responsible for ALL of the operating costs. So if it doesn't work then Brightline would shut down or another operator would step in. The taxpers wouldn't be footing the bill. This compared to the Federal Government HSR, which would have shifted costs to the State/Counties once it was up and running. And so if it didn't make money the taxpayers would be on the hook, just like they are for SunRail in Orlando and every other form of public transportation in the State of Florida.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1