I see zero issues with a logo on the field. If the school can make money for it, great. If the UAA can make 2 million dollars a year by putting 3 logos on the field, it's a no brainer. That money then can go to paying a stipend to several smaller programs like golf, tennis, swimming etc. leaving 2 million to go to the football program from the SEC media rights deal. Nike already pays the university to supply uniforms and for their logo to be on them. There really isn't any difference.
Won't get really obnoxious until they decide to start selling the yard lines, red zones, end zones and such.
Just heard a rumor that Lume is developing a corn dog scented full body deodorant and are in negotiations with Tiger stadium for on field advertising.
Don't really care about some paint on the field. I would, however, love 20 min less commercials in exchange.
My interest in CFB is vanishing just like the SEC and the traditions. Southeastern schools-not anymore. It's great to be a Florida Gator-until a better offer comes along. I won't back down-until the the bowl game. They need to drop the "College" facade.