Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

OGT-#25 Florida @ Vanderbilt 3/9/2024 4:30 pm SECN/App

Discussion in 'Nuttin but Net' started by GatorGrowl, Mar 8, 2024.

  1. iam4uf

    iam4uf GC Hall of Fame

    13,798
    9,407
    2,963
    Apr 12, 2007
    Gainesville
    Refs claimed it was touched again, but I have no idea what they were talking about.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,388
    55,075
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Hmmm . . . . so we might have gotten screwed on that one too, eh?
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. bullish

    bullish GC Hall of Fame

    3,054
    1,098
    1,853
    Nov 14, 2010
    I was there tonight, Kugel threw the ball away three times and lost the ball on dribble drives at least once or twice, loose and sloppy with the ball. So no. Handlogten lost the ball on captured rebounds more than once, they just grabbed it away from him, he is a big liability unless he is ready to fight.
    I don’t know if he scored but he didn’t do much except stand in peoples way. He plays like this in the SEC tournament, we will get a lot of rest before we are an eight or nine seed. It was embarrassing to see Vandy’s guards, wings and big drive on us easily. Pullin, Condon and Samuels came to play, the rest didn’t pull their wait. I thought this was a trap game for us and we fell in head first. Too much reading how good we are. We don’t know how to score on a zone except force it, bad on the coaches because that is what we are going to see here on out.
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2024
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Like Like x 2
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  4. bullish

    bullish GC Hall of Fame

    3,054
    1,098
    1,853
    Nov 14, 2010
    did tv replay their goaltending call on us?
     
  5. regurgigator

    regurgigator VIP Member

    8,855
    425
    283
    Apr 3, 2007
    Seattle area

    They did. Looked good to me, but close. I wish they had the camera over the goal; that's the view where you can best see if the ball is completely out of the cylinder. I also don't know what they meant by the ball being touched twice.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. audiogatorjim

    audiogatorjim GC Hall of Fame

    1,823
    843
    1,833
    Mar 15, 2009
    That “call” is utter bull schitt! I’d have that guy in my office to explain it. He can’t say that’s what he saw because it didn’t occur. The Vandy player just flopped out of bounds and the incompetent, blind ref came running in and made the BS call. When will this stop? When will these SEC refs be held accountable? When will they stop making BS calls late in games that could alter the game outcome? When will these narcissist refs realize the game is not about them? Why can’t they review this? If not allowed, change the friggin rule. They review inconsequential calls the entire game but neglect to review the important plays.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Winner Winner x 2
  7. regurgigator

    regurgigator VIP Member

    8,855
    425
    283
    Apr 3, 2007
    Seattle area
    I'd say we got jobbed with those last couple of foul calls on Haugh and Samuels.

    What happened to the emphasis on flopping? Didn't see it ever called after some early season calls. That guy flying out of bounds from Samuel's "push" should have been a "nominee."

    I'm still hopeful for the postseason. We have a strong backcourt and a strong frontcourt. I just hope we recognize what our advantages are in each game and find a way to exploit it. Seems like in today's game we should have force-fed the ball to Samuel more than we did. He seemed to be playing well and no one on Vandy seemed to be able to stop him.
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2024
    • Agree Agree x 3
  8. BA69MA72

    BA69MA72 GC Legend

    742
    227
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    If I’m reading the standings correctly, it looks like our SEC seed would have been the same win or lose this game
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. bullish

    bullish GC Hall of Fame

    3,054
    1,098
    1,853
    Nov 14, 2010
    did tv replay when the Vandy guard knock the ball from behind out of bounds, it was our ball or a foul. Of course he immediately call Vandy ball. No review and the other refs looked like the three stooges. We played down to them but these types of calls late in the game changed the outcome. The refs should be proud of themselves, “total incompetents”!
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2024
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. antny1

    antny1 GC Hall of Fame

    5,469
    2,849
    2,698
    Dec 3, 2019
    Perception or expectation of contact. I know basketball is fast and difficult to referee but if you don't see contact stop calling fouls.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
  11. GatorLurker

    GatorLurker GC Hall of Fame

    9,584
    4,094
    3,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    But getting into a situation like that is why we lost. Not all on the refs.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. bobcatgator

    bobcatgator Sophomore

    68
    33
    1,813
    Nov 24, 2011
    Plenty of Gator players played bad (real bad) but the refs reffed worse.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  13. Courfeyrac

    Courfeyrac GC Hall of Fame

    4,186
    113
    253
    Apr 8, 2007
    Austin, TX
    It was touched again ... I saw it on the replay, before the ref reviewed it and made the call.

    The ball came off the rim clean, and I think Tyrese tipped it first ... his put back would have counted.

    But Micah then tapped Tyrese's put back as it was going over the rim.

    Sucks, but the call was correct.
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
  14. audiogatorjim

    audiogatorjim GC Hall of Fame

    1,823
    843
    1,833
    Mar 15, 2009
     
  15. tegator80

    tegator80 GC Hall of Fame

    12,960
    21,066
    3,363
    May 29, 2007
    Richmond, VA
    My take?

    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  16. gatormonk

    gatormonk GC Hall of Fame

    8,282
    7,418
    2,803
    Apr 3, 2007
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  17. gatormonk

    gatormonk GC Hall of Fame

    8,282
    7,418
    2,803
    Apr 3, 2007
    Todd's comments. 20240310_072328.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,726
    1,320
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    and their 20 offensive rebounds to our 6
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. uf1998

    uf1998 Senior

    278
    166
    1,703
    Aug 19, 2023
    So you're going to post the assist numbers but not the turnover numbers? I'll post them for you, we committed 17 turnovers to their 8. That will lose games.

    And our superior FG% is negated by their +14 offensive boards. Running down the court in transition and dunking is literally no different than a guy missing a shot, rebounding, missing again, rebounding again, and then finally putting it in. They both result in two points.
     
  20. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,726
    1,320
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    Glad Golden understands, sees clearly why we lost
    Now it's time to work on that...again
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Friendly Friendly x 1