A lot to unpack here. First, I didn’t say “rich left” people I said, rich people and left people. Two separate categories. The rich people have been inadvertently (some intentionally) funding the class divide for the last 15 years or so. you missed my point about facts. Of course there are examples of absolutes, but life rarely gives you those. Instead, you are left with a box which is blue. But your neighbor says it’s aqua, his wife says it’s sky blue and your daughter says it’s purple. as for your attacks on Fox News and its viewers, that is proving both of our points. Your are right the messenger almost always corrupts the message, but Fox, CNN, NYT….they are all the same. Just different corruption. But I am right also because Fox viewers will believe the messages….just like CNN and NYT viewers/readers. Everyone on Too Hot comes on here armed with their own set of political facts, which are filtered by their principles to merge into their own set of opinions, and thus become indistinguishable.
While Obama may have decided to self-identify as Black the overwhelming majority of American society made the same determination regarding his race. Although we can argue the point ad infinitum the reality is that in the US biracial persons are considered Black.
Perhaps you haven't read a history book then. Let me help you out with facts: Fact: Most slaves in the US were born in the US and were therefore never owned by a black person. Historical Context: American Slavery in Comparative Perspective | Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History Can you provide any evidence to back your claim that 95% of slaves in the US were owned by a black person?
This is not a fact, and it is not true, because it lacks context. If I were to say that most powerful North American tribe were the Comanches would this be true or false?
Show any evidence that the majority of slaves in the US were not born in the US or that 95% of slaves were once owned by a black person. Your attempt to divert doesn't benefit your argument. Provide evidence if you are claiming that the majority of slaves in the US were not born in the US.
I know it's hard for you to comprehend....but MAGA doesn't get to decide who is a RINO and who is a true Republican. MAGA would expel Lincoln to Reagan if they were here today
Which post number did you provide evidence of 95% of slaves being owned at some point in their life by a black person or that the majority of US slaves were not born in the US?
Yet another ridiculous assertion. You get to decide what MAGA decides? ( I still don’t know when or how MAGA became a noun or what it purports to mean). Your comment is so circular and hypocritical. MAGA gets to decide what ever it wants to decide, just as you get to decide whatever you want to decide. If someone (correctly) believes Romney is not a Republican, that is up to them.
Translation: you have nothing. You claimed that this post is evidence. You are a lawyer. You are well aware of the fact that this is not actual evidence.
This is not evidence. Please provide evidence. Not just poor attempts to argue your way out of a lack of evidence.
I am well aware of the fact that I don’t have to prove anything to you, but I feel obligated as a human being to point out your errors while trying to direct you to self discovery. This way your next post will be better.
Again, this post does not provide any evidence to back your claims. You are still trying to argue your way out of a lack of evidence.
Again, this post does not provide any evidence to back your claims. You are still trying to argue your way out of a lack of evidence.
Despite your cut and paste of being wrong... you continue to be wrong….about everything. Your job is to figure out why.
