Proof?? Yes, to some, no to cultists

It was cash exactly one transaction before it went to Biden ... that's not classic laundering ... large cash transactions have to be reported by banks and attract the IRS and investigators ...

 

Dude is a trip. Now he is saying the election was stolen.

 

Are you talking about before he was in office? Of course we looked the other way

 

He disagreed with me even though it's written in the article he linked ... It's a federal law that cash deposits above $10,000 have to be reported ... not sure what there is to disagree with.

"Sara Biden withdrew $50,000 in cash from Lion Hall Group on August 28 and then deposited the funds into her and her husband’s personal checking account later that day.

On September 3, 2017, Sara Biden wrote a check to Joe Biden for $40,000."

 

What exactly is this evidence of? That James paid Joe $40k as a loan repayment. A loan where there is evidence that happened, if you read the link in my first post.

What exactly would the Chinese be buying back in 2017 for a mere $40k from private citizen Joe Biden? That's less than a month's UPenn salary Joe was pulling in back then, and less than half Joe received for speaking engagements at the time. And again, at the time, Joe was a citizen, not holding any office, and hadn't announced a run for office. So again, what exactly was the Chinese trying to do? Give a few pennies to a former VP in return for what?

There is evidence Joe loaned his brother money. There is evidence brother James paid it back. That's about it as far as Joe is concerned. Both Joe and James claim Joe had nothing to do with James' business. And even if the money was coming from the Chinese, paying Joe $40k in 2017 was a very bad investment. There is still also no connection that Joe had any idea where his brother got the money from.

 

Its only 'laundering' if it was done to clean illegally gotten money, seems like that's the part that needs proving. Since corruption is basically legal, lots of rich guys use holding companies and what not and since I doubt Biden was performing hits, personally funding terrorism (why do that when the US government can pay for it, am I right) or dealing drugs, seems like the idea is simply to just allude to something bad going on rather than actually prove it. If the plot cant be explained in a short sentence, good look getting anyone to care. Maybe if you catch him with gold bars Menendez style.

 

“Like the payment to Joe from Americore funds, it’s certainly plausible that this payment where James and Sara used funds from China was indeed a loan repayment to Joe. But even if this $40,000 check was a loan repayment from James Biden, it still shows how Joe benefited from his family cashing in on his name — with money from China no less,” Comer argues.

“Without his family peddling his name and his son threatening a CEFC associate with consequences that he said Joe Biden knew about, James wouldn’t have had the money to write the $40,000 check to his brother Joe,” he added. “It’s also worth remembering that Biden family efforts to secure millions from this Chinese company began when Joe Biden was still Vice President.”

This sums up what they are trying to claim. Joe's family cashed in on the Biden name.

As for Joe, he loaned a family member $40K and got repaid $40K ... so Joe didn't "benefit" at all in that scenario.

What I don't see in any of this is any proof ... or even a claim ... that anything illegal was done even if the extended Biden family are a bunch of grifters ... doesn't appear Joe did anything wrong either way.

 

Everyone really sidestepping the important issue here.

The OP uses Bing.

 

I'll have to carefully weigh this information against whoever the Republican nominee is for President.

 

Even if Hunter was telling the truth about his father sitting next to him ... 2017, bro... even those genius investigators from post #3 couldn't think of a reason why it was problematic in 2017. "Next Question ... " LOL

 

There is evidence Joe gave his brother a loan. If the payment back to Joe was loan repayment, and Joe ended up with no more money than he started, how is he profiting? He isn't.

$40k is a lot of money for most, but for someone making more than that in a month salary, plus book monies, and speaking money where Joe could make more than $40k for just showing up, would Joe sell out for such a small amount of money? Money, again, is repayment for a loan, and no proof that Joe is making money?

What would a Chinese company get from Joe circa late 2017/early 2018? Joe wasn't in office at the time, and wasn't running for office.

It's possible that brother Joe was peddling the Biden last name like Hunter was with Chinese companies, along with others. But not the first person to peddle a famous last name; nor will be the last. But unless there are direct connections to Joe, there is nothing but innuendo and hearsay against Joe, and very little, if no hard evidence. Do we even know Joe was actually standing next to Hunter during this conversation? Hunter, a former drug addict isn't exactly the most credible person.

Again, if Joe did loan his brother money, and this is just payback, how did Joe profit from this? And why would a Chinese company want to give a small amount to citizen Joe in 2017/18?

 

I know, right. It's like maga cult without the cult and stupid red hats or efforts to steal an election.

 

Thanks. I spit out my water all over my desk.

 

What is the illegal act that was done here? Like, what is the crime?

 

They waiver between "Joe is so senile he doesn't even know what decade we are in" to "Joe is mastermind of every business deal his extended family has been involved in over the last 10 years."

 

Hahaha. Good come back, bro.... But seriously, what is the crime?