Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Florida marijuana initiative in jeopardy despite having one million signatures

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by mrhansduck, Aug 28, 2023.

  1. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,868
    1,003
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    No one is talking about making it legal to sell to kids. Assuming that criminalization of a substance makes it any harder for kids to get on the black market (and I'm not sure if that's even true), is that a sufficient reason to lock up adults? If so, that would arguably mean we should criminalize alcohol again.

    How many adults do you know with psychosis? What percentage of them would have developed psychosis with or without marijuana? What percentage of people with psychosis or other mental health issues are self medicating with marijuana and/or other drugs? How many have been on and off prescription drugs? Moreover, how many people do you know who have used marijuana and did not develop psychosis? To me, it seems like banning peanut butter and shellfish for everybody because a relatively small percentage of people have bad reactions.

    No drug is completely harmless. My view is that anyone who doesn't already use alcohol, marijuana, nicotine, etc., shouldn't start. What we're discussing here is whether people should be arrested and locked up for doing something that half the country has done. Notably, we already have recreational marijuana in Florida for those who can afford it. How is locking up people who can't afford the card improving mental health?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. lacuna

    lacuna VIP Member

    63,374
    3,741
    2,353
    Apr 8, 2007
    Redlands, Colorado
    The oil from the bud must be infused into butter that is then used in any number of recipes.

    Premium Cannabutter

    "Making cannabutter is a time-honored way of infusing cannabis into food, since so many recipes include butter as an ingredient. But not all cannabutters are created equal. Before cannabis can be used in a recipe, it must be "activated" or, in a technical sense, decarboxylated, to maximize its benefits. Traditionally, decarbing meant heating the buds at a low temperature for two to three hours in the oven. But this method can destroy flavor and lead to bitterness.

    Thankfully, there's a better (and more delicious) way. Decarbing using the sous-vide technique eliminates the uneven and often harsh heat of the old-school method and preserves the fragrant, floral compounds in cannabis known as terpenes. Here's how to make cannabutter step by step. Recipes for Cannabis-Infused Jam-Stuffed Brioche French Toast, Buttered Pasta with Clams and Green Chiles, or Citrus-Caramel Blondies are great places to start cooking with it."

    Or purchase an infuser as my next door neighbor has.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,388
    55,074
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Thanks Lacuna. Cannabutter looks very interesting. I was wondering about the oil-like tincture that one ingests directly with a dropper. Just curious about how that's made, but I guess I could just ask the Googles. :)
     
  4. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,868
    1,003
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    According to Pew, 73% of those who are Dem/Lean Dem support legalization compared to 45% of those who are Rep/Lean Rep. 84% of liberals support legalization compared to 37% of conservatives. There is obviously a correlation with political leanings and age, for example, so we'd have to factor that in. But those seem like pretty big gaps.

    Americans overwhelmingly say marijuana should be legal for medical or recreational use
     
  5. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I can’t speak for PA, but from what I’ve gathered there are an in trivial number of people who can experience psychotic break, at least according to our kids psychiatrist. It probably isn’t good for anyone already prone to mental illness.

    In spite of that I still think it should be legal, and regulated, because the alternative of criminalizing users is worse.
     
  6. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    11,907
    1,168
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    You may or may not know the human brain isn’t fully developed until about 24-25 that in part is why younger people engage in far risked behavior than adults.

    Coincidence?

    More teens are showing up in a Denver ER after using marijuana

    “The number of teenagers sent to emergency rooms more than quadrupled after marijuana was legalized in Colorado, a new study finds”

    Marijuana-related ER visits climb at Colorado hospital
    “The findings come on the heels of a study published last week that found people who smoked strong marijuana on a daily basis were three times more likely to be diagnosed with psychosis compared with people who never used the drug. Intoxication and heart problems were other common complaints in the Colorado hospital study.”

    Smoking strong marijuana daily increases risk of psychosis, study finds

    Smoking strong marijuana daily increases risk of psychosis, study finds

    “Smoking high-potency marijuana every day could increase the chances of developing psychosis by nearly five times, according to the biggest-ever study to examine the impact of pot on psychotic disorder rates.”

    “The scientists estimated that people who smoked marijuana on a daily basis were three times more likely to be diagnosed with psychosis compared with people who never used the drug. For those who used high-potency marijuana daily, the risk jumped to nearly five times. The paper was published online Tuesday by the journal Lancet.”




    Give it time as it becomes more widespread your kids psych will see it. Ask him why his academy doesn’t recommend its use for depression or anxiety.

    High potency (that’s what all the dispensaries sell) is bad stuff for plenty of people particularly young adults.
    It’s being marketed as a panacea and there are no studies that prove it does anything.
    I’m shocked that the anti ivermectin for covid crowd is standing for this..
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2023
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I’m not disputing any of this. I can see when my daughter has consumed it she tends to eventually react badly. The Pdoc said something like 5-10% of people who consume it will experience some level of lasting psychosis.

    Having said that, I don’t think it should be illegal. Polluting the criminal Justice system with pot crimes is a waste of time.

    I have no idea how this compares to ivermectin at all and how you define “anti ivermectin” crowd. Ivermectin has no efficacy for Covid but is a useful drug against parasites.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,233
    6,182
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Because we're not arguing it's a miracle cure. We're arguing it shouldn't be outlawed. I didn't want to outlaw ivermectin because some folks were stupidly misusing it. If people want to smoke weed or eat edibles, that's their business. They should have the freedom to do it. Their personal use isn't harming anybody else.

    If it ends up hurting them, so be it. Choices have consequences. Make people aware of the risks, and let them decide for themselves. That's what we do for cigarettes and cigars.
     
  9. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    11,907
    1,168
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Oh I’m not saying it should totally be outlawed.
    It shouldn’t be available to young adults with almost no restrictions.
    It shouldn’t be promoted as helping with a litany of diseases for which there is NO basis in scientific research.

    As far as how personal use affecting others besides themselves… Well, just go look at it it affects the families they come from, often these aren’t people without families and support. The toll is staggering.
    Think about the cost to the already taxed mental healthcare system. That will affect all of us one way or another. What’s the cost to society to help care for young adults who are not able to function?

    People are completely clueless about the risks it’s not reefer madness, the high potency stuff now that has been engineered is not the same stuff people smoked decades ago when most of us were growing up.
    The info is out there for those that care to look.

    Smoking tobacco does cause cancer… after decades and decades of use.
    CIP often happens after months of use, a bit different when a 22 year old loses the ability to function for the rest of their life and a 75 year old gets lung CA.

    From what I understand in Co they slip a little warning in the bag that it can cause psychosis or mental health issues. Not because they care, but so they have an out to make it hard for them to get sued.

    You’re a smart guy do the math, do so research.

    Give it ten years when it’s available everywhere, rates in teens shoot up everywhere it’s legalized, do you really think that is a good thing?

    The tip of the iceberg is visible, will the ship get turned or is it full steam ahead?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,233
    6,182
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    If they want to place restrictions on people under 21 or under 18, that's fine. We do that with other vices. But your argument for not legalizing it for folks 21 and over isn't availing to me. It comes with risks. So do plenty of other things that are legal. Make people aware of the risks. Let them decide for themselves if they want to take the risk. That's freedom.

    You're also vastly understating the harms that smoking does, not to mention drinking, guns, automobiles, etc.
    I think it's less bad than the system we have now. And if we use some of the money we save from not incarcerating people and some of the money we make from taxing weed on mental health and addiction resources, things have suddenly gotten quite a bit better.
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  11. enviroGator

    enviroGator GC Hall of Fame

    5,532
    765
    368
    Apr 12, 2007
    That number has to be way off. That would be 1 in 10 people who smoke .... no way.

    Maybe he meant 0.5-1%. Which even then I'd guess to be high.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  12. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    Yeah I haven’t been able to confirm it elsewhere and agree that seem like an awfully high number. But he’s a pretty sharp guy and well read on research so I’m not sure what to think.

    I totally believe there is a percent who are inclined to mental illness anyway who it can have negative effects on but I have no idea what percent that is.

    Is there a link between marijuana use and psychiatric disorders? | National Institute on Drug Abuse
     
  13. Rocinante

    Rocinante Junior

    103
    50
    1,838
    May 28, 2013
    To your point about the South. When I was running the CBD company; the founder(clearly had no respect for the law; served time for MJ in other times) kept wanting a Pot Leaf in our label. Being a contientious Southerner; I told him if you want to sell this to grandma in Alabama; do not put the devil weed on the fuc**ng label. Those that know; know; those it’s new to don’t need to know. It’s sad that it was put in the bad group. May have saved many lives. One of my favorite
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Rocinante

    Rocinante Junior

    103
    50
    1,838
    May 28, 2013
    Love the unscientific bullshit.
     
  15. FutureGatorMom

    FutureGatorMom Premium Member

    10,938
    1,255
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    Has anyone answered my question? I've been bitchin on the football boards.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  16. FutureGatorMom

    FutureGatorMom Premium Member

    10,938
    1,255
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    Well this esplains a lot! 100mg???Do you turn into a skinny guy in torn clothes on all fours asking for water?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    11,907
    1,168
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Since alcohol has been legal for 100 years and High potency THC has barely been legal for a decade it’s very hard to try to compare the two.
    Legalization means use goes up( that’s been proven already in kids under 18 when it had been declining for years), eventually you’ll have plenty of data to decide it wasn’t a great idea.

    Just hope your kid isn’t one of the unlucky ones who loses their mind smoking the miracle drug…
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  18. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,868
    1,003
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    How many years or decades do you think it will take to have sufficient data to compare higher potency THC to liquor?
     
  19. FutureGatorMom

    FutureGatorMom Premium Member

    10,938
    1,255
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    So what you're saying, without any data, is that alcohol has been around 100 years so it will naturally have more data pointing to being more detrimental to our society?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    9,222
    4,610
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    It’s interesting that we have different views on what the issues are. I guess it means different things to us depending on who we are. I think the reason why a federal ban still has relevance is because of federal institutions. So… federal crimes involving marijuana would still exist, as well as bans on federal employees (FBI, military, CIA, and any other bureaucrats) usage. I used to live in Colorado, but even if I wanted to, I never could partake, because of my Army Reserve status… not that I wanted to partake.