Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

McCarthy says it out loud - cut SS and Medicare

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by tampagtr, May 31, 2023.

  1. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,941
    1,702
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    Right here
    You’re right that it’s not a perfect solution. The problem is that once that government makes a recommendation or promise, people change their behavior based on it. Those that are 70 year old today would have likely changed the way they planned for retirement had they known SS wouldn’t exist. The need for SS is actually created by the promise of it.

    You and I are only quasi-old, so we might have changed the way we planned too, but at least we have a some years left to try to fill the void. My little ones haven’t planned for retirement at all, so as long as they know what the score will be when they retire, it doesn’t much matter what the score is.
     
  2. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    5,191
    1,042
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    Go back and watch the old 60 minutes piece on SSI and how broken that system is. Compassion is often overtaken by greed and sloth. Social security is a worthy program that folks pay into, but they could go back and look at how individual changes have affected budgets over time.

    The same could be said of medicare, I wonder what the affect of mobility scooters, c-pap machines and diabetes medications are over time on a budget while ignoring the big issue.

    But alas, logic and reasonable discussions are bad.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. dynogator

    dynogator VIP Member

    6,787
    357
    418
    Apr 9, 2007
    There's no way Congress abolishes SS completely. The cuts or adjustments will be incremental, and thus less politically painful (frog in boiling water.) It sounds like there's some support for "f-ing," the elderly, so I question the force of the blowback.
     
  4. homer

    homer GC Hall of Fame

    3,041
    910
    2,078
    Nov 2, 2015

    LFG!!!!!!!!!!

    Signed, #1 boomer
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  5. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,650
    2,896
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
  6. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    36,460
    1,903
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    Are there any reasonable alternatives to Medicare or Social Security?
     
  7. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    19,223
    6,515
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    The elderly are reliable voters. I'm not for f'ing over anybody, but if the elderly are willing to support cutting Social Security and Medicare as long as they aren't the ones who have to deal with those cuts, f them.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. BobK89

    BobK89 GC Hall of Fame

    12,169
    450
    818
    Apr 9, 2007
    Tampa, FL
    So my current employer and I have been paying into SS and Medicare for 30 years, plus the 8 years I worked in other jobs before I began my career and I'm not entitled to this? Hard pass.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  9. slayerxing

    slayerxing GC Hall of Fame

    5,353
    924
    2,078
    Aug 14, 2007
    It's just so frustrating, because it's the existence of the large generation of boomers in the first place that is essentially breaking the system. So they get all the benefits, but then break it, so now the next generations get screwed. Just one last F U from the boomers before they fade away. So frustrating.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  10. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    34,525
    12,410
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Do you think people with assets in excess of $10M need to collect SS? Is there any net worth where the individual could sacrifice for the common good? I see people living in $5M+ homes driving Bentley's getting botox shots monthly acting like they are going to keel over if their SS is threatened
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2023
  11. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    36,460
    1,903
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    Does the fact that they funded it for 50 years come into play at all?
     
  12. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,817
    6,342
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
    Something needs to be done, it won’t be solvent in around a decade.
    The earlier we shore it up the less painful the cuts.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  13. swampbabe

    swampbabe GC Hall of Fame

    3,726
    934
    2,643
    Apr 8, 2007
    Viera, FL
    Yep, I’m getting ready to apply as we speak. Been paying in for 48 years and I want my money ;)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,650
    2,896
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Overfunded it, to be precise. The 80s deal, anticipating the bump from their retirement.

    From Wiki:

    Also of concern was the long-term prospect for Social Security because of demographic considerations. Of particular concern was the issue of what would happen when people born during the post–World War II baby boom retired. The NCSSR made several recommendations for addressing the issue.[65] Under the 1983 amendments to Social Security, a previously enacted increase in the payroll tax rate was accelerated, additional employees were added to the system, the full-benefit retirement age was slowly increased, and up to one-half of the value of the Social Security benefit was made potentially taxable income.[66][67]

    Social Security Trust Fund[edit]
    The 1983 Amendments also included a provision to exclude the Social Security Trust Fund from the unified budget (to take it "off-budget"[citation needed]). Yet today Social Security is treated like all the other trust funds of the Unified Budget.[citation needed]

    As a result of these changes, particularly the tax increases, the Social Security system began to generate a large short-term surplus of funds, intended to cover the added retirement costs of the "baby boomers". Congress invested these surpluses into special series, non-marketable U.S. Treasury securities held by the Social Security Trust Fund. Under the law, the government bonds held by Social Security are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.



    History of Social Security in the United States - Wikipedia
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  15. slayerxing

    slayerxing GC Hall of Fame

    5,353
    924
    2,078
    Aug 14, 2007
    It should. Actually I've read some stuff recently that for many, they paid more out then they will get back. Although that was a few years ago - I don't know what the math says now. But listen, the median age in the house is almost 58 (for republicans). That means more than half the house are boomers. So essentially you have older people who want to cut a system, and they will probably protect themselves and people like them from those cuts, and once again, the younger generation - the one that currently lives with the bleakest retirement outcomes of any modern generation, have one less social safety net. And it just really pisses me off.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,650
    2,896
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    I share your outrage daily at the plight of the younger generation. We have left them a terrible world. Personally, I try to take that into account on how much is right to "support" our daughter, acknowledging that she has it much much harder than I did at that point in life
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  17. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    5,191
    1,042
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    All the boomers need to call into fox and the talking points will change. No one wants an angry pre election town hall. Fix the system.
    The whole everybody do their own thing is nutty. So no what do you do with the millions who squandered or were scammed, poverty slums? Nope, you take care of folks. The GOP solutions have more holes in it than a golf course in jersey
     
  18. Gatorhead

    Gatorhead GC Hall of Fame

    18,445
    6,256
    3,313
    Apr 3, 2007
    Philadelphia

    Why do Republicans hate old people or the infirm so much?

    So they cut all Gov't programs for the needy - Then what, pass "open season" with AR15's to get rid of them?

    Or maybe they can replicate that movie - the one where when you turn 30 you get a spike through your head. Logans Run?

    Jesus, no food, no shelter, no health care...............damn loving people, the GOP.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  19. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    13,588
    2,825
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    As someone a long way from SS I could argue that if you haven’t paid your 35 trillion dollar debt before you retire why should you be able to collect a piece of the 5 trillion you supposedly put away? You are leaving the rest of us 30 trillion in the hole. I swear you boomers. :devil:

    Having said that, SS is just a few tweaks from being solid for a long time.
     
  20. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,941
    1,702
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    Right here
    I know how you feel. Indeed, the last thing we should want is one group of people being allowed to exploit everyone else. I don’t know that this is what’s happening though. It’s not really the boomers fault that their generation in larger than those that came later, any more that it’s gen z’s fault that it’s smaller than the boomers. And I’m guessing the boomers personally wouldn’t gain much personal satisfaction by learning Gen X will get lower retirement benefits.

    I’m not arguing that we should cut SS and Medicare, but I think it shouldn’t be closed off for discussion. If we decide that it’s essential, or unacceptable to cut benefits to only younger people, then I think we need to just find a way to fund it. The trouble is, of course, that this “we” isn’t a single voice.