Kudos to posters in the thread for not veering into a food fight and keeping it as a thoughtful discussion.
His interviews have gotten better. Opens up more, less player-speak, more smiling.
You make good points. My measure though was "in good times and bad." In the last few years, we here have cooked up all kinds of schemes for how...
I agree, the campus and fan base need to be invested, in good times and bad...that's a durable "blue blood" status IMO.
Hard to believe this was the first SEC natty since 2012 UK.
WVU
He's also a dad. I wonder if the changes in his life have given him a broader, grownup view.
I love The Athletic so I immediately scoured all their coverage this morning. I was disappointed in the narratives. Lots more focus on Samson...
It took me a long time to think we were top 4 SEC.
A brave choice too.
Another stat...4 total fouls call first half, 25 the second.
Gotta say, I know everybody talked about Houston's defense, but I'm still surprised by 28 in first half.
I will say this: you better drive a stake in the heart of this team. No lead is safe.
That drive by Haugh, into 3+ defenders, was: (a) dumb and (b) surprising (or not at all) no foul call.
That was a good point pre-game, if Houston winds up with 8+ more shots, they win.
