Alien Enemies Act - Trump Defies 9 - 0 Suprme Court Ruling

I love how the right elected a convicted felon who jury also found raped a woman. Spare us the nonsense.

 

I love how the cult chooses to ignore the SCOTUS

 

There's only one party that elects them to Washington time and time again

 

Like this guy.
Documenting Trump’s Abuse of Women
For his 1993 book, “The Lost Tycoon,” Harry Hurt III acquired Ivana’s divorce deposition, in which she stated that Trump raped her.
Or this guy
Pete Hegseth's former sister-in-law alleges in affidavit he was abusive to second wife
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senators vetting the nomination of Pete Hegseth for defense secretary received an affidavit Tuesday from a former sister-in-law alleging that the onetime Fox News host was abusive to his second wife, to the point where she feared for her safety. Hegseth denies the allegations.

I would add that both the late Ivana Trump and Hegseth's ex-wife backed off the allegations of abuse although I would also add that both received large divorce settlements that included NDAs.

 

. How about Venezuelans with TPS? Legal status. Not illegal. And productive here. Did you read the Judge’s order enjoining the removal of that status? The Court Found Noem’s justifications to be stereotypical and racist. Do you think that since Trump’s election things have changed for the better in Venezuela? Or Cuba? Or Haiti? Or is the racism identified in the Judge’s order appealing to the right? Or perhaps the right prefers a government like they have in Venezuela? Trump did send an en it there. And the sudden removal of parole status pending hearings on asylum applications? The right to apply for asylum is a legal pathway. Not illegal. So let’s be clear what the Trump policies are. They are anti-immigrant regardless of status. Thats what the birthright executive order is all about. And the Judge is right. The polices are hate filled racism

 

what a pile of horse dookey

 

Should we honor SCOTUS rulings? Yes or No?

 

As a reminder, you have often referred to legal immigrants and residents as illegal immigrants. Perhaps you should look at this as a learning opportunity to understand all the different forms or statuses of immigrants, since you care so much about their legality. Or, alternatively, if you just don't like immigrants of any form, I guess that wouldn't be important.

 

This is your opportunity to cite the Constitution and any laws that support your position. Since you obviously have such strong conviction about immigration issues I’m sure we can all expect an informative rebuttal.

 

Like other Fascists, the right doesn't care about the Constitution as long as they like the outcome.

 

I've asked four five of them on the board if they are okay with ignoring a Supreme Court ruling and they just pivot to some other talking point

 

Try explaining why. Otherwise you are just hurling insults. The Supreme Court disagrees with you. The idea is that one cannot turn the apparatus of the federal government against someone without notice and an opportunity to be heard. That simple concept applies to everyone except diplomats who are immune from our laws. Perhaps if we had a competent government committed to such simple concepts, they would understand this simple idea and actually make progress. If they came for you in some issue, you spine want to be heard too. Say a tax case? Should the government decide to execute in your assets first a tax claim when you have a defense that you paid your taxes? Why shouldn’t you have a hearing? Should the courts require the government to give you notice and an opportunity to be heard, or just have the right to take action? With no review?

 

Because they are OK with it. Like DeSantis said yesterday about the decision finding Florida’s immigration law unconstitutional. The courts should not be telling the executive branch what to do about immigration. That’s what he said. Thats exactly what get think. As if the courts have no say in what laws mean or what due process is required.

 

Well play with it but why don't they just come out and say that they don't care what the SCOTUS says

 

Keep in mind it’s a 6-3 conservative court, and often times the court makes radical/dubious rulings with 5 or 6 votes.

Sometimes you’ll see Thomas and Alito on the wild side of a 2-7. So if this court goes against them 9-0 (not even Thomas or Alito) you know it’s wildly off the rails or totally and completely antithetical to rule of law.

 

Supreme Court ruled 7-2 overnight that they have to give hearings to the immigrants they were about to deport and the court stopped the imminent deportations that were in disregard of the earlier decisions. Alito and Thomas dissenting of course.

 

They don’t need to. It’s rhetorical

 

It's hard to type the words, "the President should just ignore the Supreme Court and do whatever he wants to," isn't it?