Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

Concise timeline for the wholly conjured-up mass-panic. Note: the fraudulent diagnostic that fueled the perception of a pandemic was approved, without an isolate, inside of 24 hours …

 

But whatever you do, don’t ask questions.

 

Fun Fact: every American who’s lampooned Trump, for supposedly recommended bleach, has likely had three or more Trump vaccines.

 

The difference between most of you people and chickens is that the chickens have to be locked down

 

Polio and the polio vaccine. More nuanced then you thought,?

 

I meant to link this video in the above post. 2 minutes on polio

 

US author falsely claims polio vaccine 'doesn't work' - CEDMO
Wrong About Polio: A Review of Suzanne Humphries, MD and Roman Bystrianyk’s “Dissolving Illusions” Part 1 (the long version)

 

Despite the potential for "brain bleed" due to endless hucksterism and stupidity, I listened to the first 7 minutes and counted 3 blatant lies. This woman should have license taken away. She is a discredited scumbag who has profited, just like Kennedy, from anti-vax lies.

Wrong About Polio: A Review of Suzanne Humphries, MD and Roman Bystrianyk’s “Dissolving Illusions” Part 1 (the long version)

 

The manipulation to establish mythical ‘vaccine efficacy’ is unbelievable and should raise many more eyebrows than it does.

I surmise that the only reason people still fear diseases like polio - and continue to place their trust in medical interventions is that they are not the least bit curious.

 

I'm not endorsing anything Suzanne Humphries says. Just throwing it on here for discussion.

 

I find it ironic that the fact-checkers regard themselves as ‘skeptics’ when it has, through hard procedures, been established that there is nothing to vaccinate for. But it’s easy to understand why professional whose livelihoods would fight the revelation tooth-and-nail:

“SBM is entirely owned and operated by the New England Skeptical Society, a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting science and critical thinking.”

 

Add: ironically, Suzanne Humphries’ fact-checkers are full-throated virus believers like her.

The difference of course is that her vaccine criticisms undercut their livelihoods.

They are not objective observers.

 

As a virus believer (she’s a fellow believer of yours) Humphries enjoys “limited hangout” privileges, otherwise known as controlled opposition. Thus, it is not viruses which are sacrosanct, but rather the notion of vaccine efficacy to protect. And the media and pharma frame her as “controversial” or “dangerous” to dissuade independent research.

 

You expect MAGA to read? LOL!!!

 

Didn’t you say you’ve had all your Trump vaccines ?

 

Three if I remember correctly. Never been healthier. Literally. Usually get at least one cold a year. Haven't had even a sniffle since COVID. Granted, I did quit smoking during that time too.

And the "read" thing is more about will than ability. They're the most mentally lazy people in the history of politics. No chance they put in the effort to both click a link and actually read an article.

 

I’m the control in the experiment. Unlike you, I refused the Trump vaccine and I’ve never had so much as sniffles. As a compliant, did you get a punchcard ? Punch three holes and get a MAGA cap?

 

If it did, I lost it. You see, I don't give a shit about COVID. Because I don't have to.

 

Thoughts and Prayers as you could be an asymptomatic myocarditis victim.