The American voter doesn't deserve freedom. We will see if there are any true patriots left here shortly...
Hey, I get it. Due process takes time, and while the sticklers for law and order are futzing around, the alien invaders are raping and killing at will. And laughing at the stupid gringos! So much easier, and efficient (calling DOGE!) to just cast a wide net, profile for alienness (brown, tattoos, mean eye squint) and call it a day. Load 'em into semis and head for Juarez. Proclaim yourself the greatest president in American history, and submit Noble Prize application. Easy peezy.
For your own piece of mind, you need to quit fretting about the President being a 'criminal'. You all's strategy didn't work.....it's over.
I've been around for decades. I've been a democrat, then a republican, then an independent. There is no question that democrats are routinely the ones on the side of criminals. I'm sure you know that. The President should be bound by laws but I'd consider deporting violent illegal immigrant gangs to be an emergency. If someone was breaking into your house, would you call your lawyer to see what you can do legally?
Why are you telling me this? Shouldn't you be off trying to deceive (some more) for the rapey felon Trump?
That’s why you have hearings. So that the government doesn't brand someone in an undesirable category and take adverse action without cause. This person is not an illegal alien. He was an asylumn seeker who kept his appointments with the government. It just shows that the use of this late 18th Century wartime Act is a pretext to avoid judicial scrutiny.
Cool analogy. Could you now help getting deported all these traitors, and the traitor who led them into "breaking into our house"?
Seems your example would be more apt if you said: "If the government agent was breaking into your house, would you call your lawyer to see what you can do legally?" That's why the call to the lawyer is important. Due process is fundamental.
It's very interesting to me how a moderate, like myself, is perceived by extremists on both sides. Lefties think I'm a trumper. Trumpers think I'm a leftie. It's fascinating.
Perhaps you are mistaking people's contempt for you as some kind of ideological thing - "everyone hates me so I must be a moderate." We've all seen your posts (which could be characterized as nothing but right-wing), maybe its just you?
I'm left of center on plenty of things. I catch tons of flak from the right for not being a trumper, not being a gun nut, not being a hard core capitalist, being against the death penalty, favoring limited abortion rights, etc.. It's entertaining to me because I can see the idiocy from both extremes.
You've been on this thread basically saying accused criminals have no rights, due process, etc and the government should be able to do whatever to them (a pretty extreme stance TBH), to me it just seems like you are confusing not having any principles for "moderation." The ends justifying the means isnt a stance of 'moderation,' is it?
I'm only saying I'm moderate over all....not on every single issue. I don't like criminals. If they get shafted from time to time, I don't really care much.
Except that you voted for a criminal, who is currently breaking the law in an unconstitutional way that will already has result in innocent people being harmed. And you have and continue to repeatedly shill for said criminal, attempting to deceive people. In fact, you voted for the only POTUS in US history to try and overturn an election, this through a criminal conspiracy. So why are you trying to cloak it all in meaningless words? You're on the side of an un-American criminal, criminals, and crime. It doesn't matter if you're very far from alone there - that's where you are. That's what you are. Want to change that? Go ahead, make the change. But spraying meaningless words here about being a "moderate" is not doing so.
I believe what’s being pointed out is the hypocrisy in talking about the criminals and rapists coming into this country that must be deported while voting for a criminal and rapist for President.
He doesn't engage in honest discourse. That's just his way of trying to whitewash history - by labelling 34 felony convictions and dozens of other felony indictments by three other different grand juries as a "strategy." It's (an attempt at) deception of the most flagrant and laughable variety. Many or most people would call it lying. It's the type of attempt at deception and dishonesty that needed to be firmly stamped out 8+ years ago. Might as well draw the line now .....
