Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Are Nukes Actually Real ?

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by duggers_dad, Mar 7, 2025 at 9:18 AM.

Page 4 of 4
  1. Mar 9, 2025 at 4:21 PM #61
    Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    90,017
    27,110
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    It's because of the lack of metals in the building construction of that old city. Metals will hold the radiation. Metals unlike concrete and wood will get and stay irradiated for much longer.
     
  2. Mar 9, 2025 at 4:31 PM #62
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,153
    1,296
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
  3. Mar 9, 2025 at 4:32 PM #63
    Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    90,017
    27,110
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
  4. Mar 9, 2025 at 4:42 PM #64
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,153
    1,296
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Whenever we walk outside we are subjected to radiation. Granted, my thread title is provocative, but to study here puts it nicely, “discrepancy between perception and results”, with common perception being that, for all the horror of the blast (which is contained) it’s the fallout that makes nukes so horrible. Judging from Hiroshima, Nagasaki and subsequent tests and accidents … it’s up for debate.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Mar 9, 2025 at 4:51 PM #65
    Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    90,017
    27,110
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yes, we even use radiation to treat cancers.
     
  6. Mar 9, 2025 at 4:54 PM #66
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,153
    1,296
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    I might put that in the category of the guys who tickled the dragon.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. Mar 9, 2025 at 4:55 PM #67
    pogba

    pogba All American

    494
    116
    1,783
    Nov 28, 2013
    Up for debate by whom exactly? They know these answers and have studied them. Just because you don't understand the studies and read blogs from people who have no clue what they are talking about, doesn't make it "up for debate"
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Mar 9, 2025 at 4:58 PM #68
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,153
    1,296
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    You don’t do science. You enforce orthodoxy.
     
  9. Mar 9, 2025 at 5:03 PM #69
    pogba

    pogba All American

    494
    116
    1,783
    Nov 28, 2013
    No, scientists do science. Bloggers who have no clue what they are talking about are not going to have a claim to change what is known at a point in time by scientists by saying stuff like "mustard gas was used, not bombs. Citation: Jimmy 2 times at 7-11". If you have a Phd and are in a lab, please let me know and I will update my assertion.
     
  10. Mar 9, 2025 at 5:15 PM #70
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,153
    1,296
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    If you were to be transported back to the time of Galileo’s house arrest you would have told the guards, “I’m going with you. I want to see that clown’s face when you cuff him!”
     
  11. Mar 9, 2025 at 5:17 PM #71
    pogba

    pogba All American

    494
    116
    1,783
    Nov 28, 2013
    You link a random substack of a guy who thinks vaccines are witchcraft (direct quote) and that includes citations that potentially mustard gas was used instead of nuclear weapons and are equating that to...Galileo?
     
  12. Mar 9, 2025 at 5:19 PM #72
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    18,153
    1,296
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Almost forgot, the mustard gas guy was an MD.

    Who are you to question a doctor ?
     
  13. Mar 9, 2025 at 5:20 PM #73
    pogba

    pogba All American

    494
    116
    1,783
    Nov 28, 2013
    An MD. Was his board certified specialty nuclear warfare?
     
Page 4 of 4