of our dead allies that fought with us through multiple wars over the last 20 - 30 years in response to his comments about our allies the man is nearly as vile as dt JD Vance Hit with Coffin Photos After Belittling Europe's Military and NATO Veterans Emphasizing the transactional nature of Trump-era diplomacy, Vance told Hannity: “If you want real security guarantees, if you want to actually insure that Vladimir Putin does not invade Ukraine again, the very best security guarantee is to give Americans economic upside in the future of Ukraine. That is a way better security guarantee than 20,000 troops from some random country that hasn’t fought a war in 30 or 40 years.” The “random” countries that have pledged continued support for Ukraine are NATO members which, as Vance says, have not been at war for decades — a fact often hailed as one of the great achievements of NATO, an alliance established in the aftermath of two devastating world wars that devastated Europe. ........................ Vance’s statement struck a sensitive nerve, as NATO nations have sent military troops into wars in the the last “30 or 40 years,” including the longest war ever fought by the U.S. military, which began when the U.S. invaded Afghanistan in 2001 in a post-911 effort to protect the U.S. homeland from terrorist attacks originating there. According to NATO: “For nearly 20 years, NATO Allies and partner countries had military forces deployed to Afghanistan under a United Nations (UN) Security Council mandate. NATO Allies went into Afghanistan after the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States, to ensure that the country would not again become a safe haven for international terrorists to attack NATO member countries. Over the last two decades, there have been no terrorist attacks on Allied soil from Afghanistan.” Vance’s statements dismissive of the power, participation and history of European allies have stirred anger among NATO nations, some of whose citizens are resurfacing and sharing photos of coffins of British and Canadians troops who were killed “supporting America’s war in Afghanistan through our support under NATO Article 5.” As one replied: “But JD Vance says that this never happened. He never even said thank you.”
JD Fluffer is also a guy who justified telling racist lies on behalf of the Trump campaign. What can one say? These are racist liars who try to attempt to deceive the public about a criminal conspiracy to overturn an election. In order to support a rapist felon. 'Merica
I expected Vance to be an attack dog and the potential for being vicious, but surprised in some of the comments that are petty and easily refuted. This comment and the “you never say thank you”. I thought he was smarter than that.
He’s smart enough to know his base doesn’t know or doesn’t care about the truthfulness, but laps up the vitriol targeting anyone they disagree with.
Honestly - Vance, especially since he is such a flip-flopper, is even more disgusting to me than Trump. He's an entitled, sanctimonious, windbag. He represents everything the world hates about Americans. He probably literally thinks his shit doesn't stink.
Trump glazers don’t care, they will continue to support dumbass Vance until he inevitably falls out with Trump then the glazers will hate him.
Yeah sure, we should have just given Russia everything they wanted from the beginning. Because you know, that's the humanitarian approach. Give ma a ####### break with that crap. I can't believe you ACTUALLY believe that. Hey, if you don't sign over your car to me, I'm going to come to your house and kick your ass. Are you going to give me your car now to avoid bloodshed? Somehow I doubt it. No, what you'll do is call someone, maybe the police, and or, threaten me in return with violence. But let's say, the mayor of your town came to your house and said, hey, in order to avoid problems we just want you to give slayerxing your car. HOW WOULD YOU FEEL? And oh, by the way, if you don't give slayerxing your car, we are going to force you to move out of your house. Would you just sit back and take it?
Disagree all you want, @g8orbill you’re literally a prime example of someone from his base this applies to.
Again, it’s not the attempt but the way in which they’re going about doing it. @slayerxing explained it well enough so I’ll save myself the wasted effort since your comment makes it clear you have no intention of honestly discussing it.
I don’t know what they hoped to accomplish with that, but by now everyone should know that no one in the Trump administration cares anything about the deaths of anyone not close to them. Also all this talk about Trump wanting to stop the bloodshed and end the conflicts has nothing to do with some altruistic epiphany sent down from Heaven. What Trump wants is a Nobel Peace Prize because Obama got one.
This is a reflection of inexperienced politicians who live inside a right wing social media bubble. A lot of people say that in those circles and it becomes normalized to them. It just doesn’t dawn on them that most people don’t think like that.
Well unless Russia agrees to and abides by a ceasefire (and I’ve yet to see our Putin puppet demand this), all we are doing by depriving Ukraine of intel is giving a likely edge to Russia slaughtering more Ukranians. Not sure tilting the field back towards an invading force or trying to force their capitulation is much of a “peace” move, no matter how the depraved propagandists want to frame it.
