It'll be interesting to see how she does in CA and also who the dems pick in '28. I hope they pick Kamala in '28 so she can have longer to get her message out.
1. Obviously edited to make the candidate look better. Media playing favorites? 2. Keep in mind this is the person selected to replace Biden. He was SO bad that Kamala Harris looked viable. So who was actually making the decisions and running the country.. because it was not the President or Vice President.
Obviously the right wing nuts dont like the fact she tore down Trump's policies and offered a better approach. Tariffs are terrible policy and her position was validated by the stock market crash the few hours Trump had them in place. Shit, even Trump doesnt like Trump policies. She was right about everything in that interview other than the fact that she thought Americans would get to know her and reject Trump's vile nonsense. Nope. They love it.
Not to mention, did they even watch the debate? Kamala eviscerated the dude. If an alleged idiot like Harris can destroy Trump so easily, what does that say about Dementia Don’s intellect?
hahahahaha I guess we did not watch the same debate and more of the American people disagreed with your statement
Pretty much everyone unanimously agreed Kamala easily won that debate, lol. I guess you were impressed with the multiple senile ranting that Trump did, though. Hell, even Fox freaking News said Harris handled him. She gave substantive answers and baited Trump multiple times, and he gladly fell into her trap. It was a massacre my dude.
He's right. No one thought Trump out debated her. More people cared about egg prices than policies for America though. That is a lesson Trump isnt learning from.
Defining "won that debate" is key. Do we define the team that scores the first TD the winner of a game? Or how about the team that returns a punt 40 yards? Are they the winner? Or is it the team that has the most points on the board at the conclusion of the 4th quarter (or overtime if needed)? As I pointed out at the time, Harris may have won the flash polls the media ran right after the debate, but there was a very noticeable shift in the polling numbers towards Trump in key battleground states, particularly Georgia and Arizona in the days following that debate. In fact, I would argue that debate was the beginning of the end for Kamala Harris in terms of realistic chances to win the race. I documented all of this extensively as it was happening last September. Georgia and Arizona were notable shifts, because the controversy stemming from the debate was Trump's comment about immigrants eating cats. That obviously galvanized traditional conservatives in the sun belt states. From this standpoint, Trump was the clear winner of the debate. His strategy was to be intentionally provocative so as to draw attention to the immigration issue. And his quip afterwards about Kamala begging him for another debate was 100% accurate. If she had decimated him in the debate, as you seem to be arguing, she wouldn't want or need another debate and it would have been political suicide for her to debate him again if that was the case. She lost the debate, because Trump controlled the post-debate narrative in the media. It's funny to me how Dems still haven't figured this out about Trump. He is a master of marketing and knows how to push buttons to get a message out. Kamala sucked at this and that is why she begged him for another debate. She knew she lost.
