Just pointing out the obvious (that the dems with the help of the media intentionally damaged Trump in his first term).
I partially agree with your premise and I do believe the same stuff will happen again. With extra fuel on the fire inspired by his horrible personality and his desire to circumvent the legislative branch via executive fiat to try to govern.
Have you ever posted on here that you would like congress to get to the bottom of the Russian collusion hoax? That was kind of a big deal as it took a huge, coordinated effort to pull off and probably cost Trump a consecutive term. Or was Trump deserving of that treatment because you don't like him? Because that appears to be what you are suggesting. As for executive orders, were you against them when Obama and Joey were handing them out, and if so, did you state that on here? Talk about Trump derangement syndrome.
As a reminder, his campaign manager was found to have shared campaign polling data with Russian officials from the same agency that was targeting social media messaging to benefit Trump. That is, by definition, collusion. I don't think that the US government should be investigating things just to address your cognitive dissonance.
im generally against executive orders regardless of President, but obviously more so when I disagree with the policy they are pushing. They are too easy to overturn, challenge or defund, etc. but I understand the inclination given the issues in house and senate. I again partially agree with your premise, but I also don’t believe as much was made up as you do. People legit broke the law and went to prison. Can’t just wash that away.
VegasBot??? If @vegasfox is a "bot", then half the incredibly repetitive, unoriginal, and superfluous TDS afflicted Leftists on this site, must surely be robo-monkies taking marching orders from CNN.
Simply astounding that any grown adult American is still so totally ignorant on this matter. Here, buddy - learn something. Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help. The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf. The findings, including unflinching characterizations of furtive interactions between Trump associates and Russian operatives...... Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election
What did their prosecutions have to do with the charges against Trump, and why were the charges ever processed in the first place knowing what the FBI and DOJ knew? The same FBI thar told Twitter and Facebook to squelch the Hunter Biden story. Heck, google wouldn't even pull it up. Trump wins reelection if neither happens. That is some banana republic chit right there.
Did you even read the entire findings, adult smart guy? It basically states that the dossier was BS and should have never been presented to the FISA court. Panel members also stated that Trump’s campaign did not coordinate with Russia. "They say that while the report shows the Russian government “inappropriately meddled” in the election, “then-candidate Trump was not complicit.”
Can you not read? The findings, including unflinching characterizations of furtive interactions between Trump associates and Russian operatives, echo to a large degree those of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation and appear to repudiate the Republican president’s claims that the FBI had no basis to investigate whether his campaign was conspiring with Russia.
Associates? What does that mean? Did the Trump campaign collude with Russia, and did the FBI/DOJ admit that they knew the dossier had holes in it before they presented it to the FISA court?
