Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

CIA believes COVID originated in lab

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by ColoradoNoVaGator, Jan 26, 2025 at 1:34 PM.

  1. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,351
    2,200
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    I don’t think he really needed it; still, I find that petty.
     
  2. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    17,224
    1,256
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Complains of pettiness.
     
  3. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    17,224
    1,256
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    They say astrology is a science too. Virologists are people who presuppose viruses and see them into existence.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  4. DawgFanFromAlabam

    DawgFanFromAlabam GC Hall of Fame

    2,402
    312
    308
    Apr 18, 2007
    It’s not feigned.
     
  5. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    17,224
    1,256
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    weightless
     
  6. cocodrilo

    cocodrilo GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 8, 2007
    See post #80. (He apparently watches FoxNews. "No clue what you are talking about.") With opinions like that abroad, maybe Fauci needed it.
     
  7. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,351
    2,200
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    Ah.
     
  8. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    9,171
    1,130
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 2
  9. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,568
    2,691
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Silly. It will never be proven so it doesn’t matter. Even if it was from a lab it doesn’t prove it was intentional, meaning you are still in the same spot.

    Hell, the right wing buffoons didn’t want to do anything to slow the spread anyway so why would the origin matter? They didn’t even want to use the vaccines so even if it was from a lab extra info to develop a vaccine earlier that right wingers didn’t want to use? That makes no sense. You all make no sense
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  10. gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Hall of Fame

    2,595
    300
    228
    Aug 9, 2024
    This. It's got additional importance because it's a complaining point for Trumpers; it was really #NOT FAIR to Donald.
     
  11. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    33,394
    12,282
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    What are the odds the CIA is telling someone what they want to hear. It isn’t like potus is known to lash out and cause harm to those that tell him what he doesn't want to hear.

    What would have been the tweet or EO if they agreed with all the science that shows incremental changes in the market as the virus mutated between species.

    It makes sense as to why they added the low degree of confidence qualifier that seems lost on people with an agenda.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    9,166
    927
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Didn’t the FBI have some similar conclusion many months ago?

    Seems kind of pointless with the “low confidence” qualifier. I mean most people probably lean that way anyway, so them saying it with low confidence comes off as pretty worthless if there’s no particular evidence or intel to base it on.

    I assume the Chinese know. But as it’s embarrassing to them either way they are never going to give an honest account.
     
  13. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    9,171
    1,130
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    It’s not pointless; that’s how they have to qualify their findings: low, medium, and high confidence. DOE was low, CIA low, DNI low, and FBI medium.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  14. studegator

    studegator GC Legend

    760
    250
    1,918
    Feb 24, 2008
    DOE = Low
    CIA= Low
    DNI = Low
    FBI =. Medium
    Equals = Definitely High
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  15. AgingGator

    AgingGator GC Hall of Fame

    4,005
    860
    2,088
    Apr 24, 2007
    This is exactly where I am on this travesty.
     
  16. QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,674
    1,679
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    You have not done your research…
     
  17. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    9,166
    927
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Low confidence is tantamount to “people are saying”. It means they don’t have any real evidence. In fact if you read what was released it actually says it’s not based on new evidence and is based on “the previously available body of reporting”. Do they even have… intelligence on this? Sounds more like they are just going of public reports.

    I - random citizen - also have “low confidence” it’s most likely lab leak, but then it would stand to reason a lab worker would have been patient zero. The fact they can’t pin that down is why it’s of “low confidence”. I would find “we have low confidence it came from a wet market” to be an equally asinine statement from an agency 4 years later if they can’t pin down patient zero or the animal/sample in question.

    I assess a medium chance that China actually does know.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    4,971
    976
    553
    Sep 22, 2008
    I'm still waiting for one of the right winners to tell us why Trump would push for and take credit for the development of a vaccine that's supposedly killed millions of people?
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  19. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    11,102
    1,464
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Nothing to see here. Just a worldwide pandemic that killed millions. Damn MAGAs were so obsessed with point of origin.
     
  20. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    89,553
    26,983
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    Maybe add Chinese Wuhan lab to your title?