Is what Biden did legal? Yes, so no problem with it. But the more times things go back and forth, the more each side will take advantage of the system. Ideally none of them should be doing shady shit so I guess I don't get what I want.
Yes he did. He played Trump. Unfortunate this man was in the position he was. Fauci is truly an evil person…
Trump was so weak and incompetent that he got played by Fauci. Then Trump got smart and learned all about covid. And told people to take malaria drugs and horse de-wormer. And shove a UV light up their asses.
From the people that hid it from you for years. Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review - PMC Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review Deworm this. A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness - PMC - A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness.
At this point in time, presidential pardons should be eliminated as they are self serving and/or political in nature. The system has lost integrity. But that pesky constitution.
Good stuff. It is just not worth my time trying to discuss this with many on here. They are not evidence based but media based in their beliefs. End of the day. I get the very initial stages where doctors were getting just bad advice from the cdc on how to treat. But it did not take long to realize ventilators were basically a death sentence. And that there are many drugs with safe track records that could be attempted. That were CHEAP! Instead the idiots in positions of influence with the power of the media pushed expensive therapies that for the most part failed. All the while knowing the vast majority of people were at little to no risk at all.
Poster No that is not the ruling of the USSC. The Supreme Court dicta implies it but Federal courts have ruled that it does not imply guilt and SC has not ruled otherwise.
And while Trump was pushing back, at least a little bit, you were the [insert gender here] who was driving alone in a car wearing a mask.
LOL. These were published in 2020. How is that “hidden from you for years”? The first link is not even a trial. The second study you cite from 2020 was a study of 72 patients in Bangladesh in 2020. You think that’s definitive, or was it the double blind controlled trial of 1300+ in 2022? Crackpot sites ignore the more recent data and the 2020 published articles are now “the secret they’ve been hiding for years”. You are their target market. How many vitamin supplements did you buy?
Just a terrible look for Fauci. Anyone defending Fauci, please answer why the pardon goes back to 2014. He obviously has a lot to hide.
Remdesivir, HCQ, Ivermectin, vaccines, etc. … Big Pharma. I’m watching creaky narrative vs. controlled opposition. RFK Jr. is solidly implanted in the latter group.
Fauci escaped justice. He should be behind bars.Yes he should be compelled to testify. His pension should be taken away. Not sure if civil suits can be brought against him.
I suspect that Fauci believed, with all his heart, mind, soul and strength, that a deadly pathogen was afoot and that vaccines were the only defense against cataclysmic slaughter. Further, I suspect that Trump trusted in Fauci with all his heart, mind, soul and strength. And the people, a goodly percentage of whom trusted in Fauci, with all their hearts, minds, souls and strength … now need a scapegoat (whether Trump or Fauci) to carry the fingerprints, of the panic they embraced, out into the wilderness. The so-called pandemic was the entirely logic outworking of a near universal belief that fueled the societal evil that broke America.
Evaluation of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for the prevention of COVID-19 (COPCOV): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial | PLOS Medicine
There was nothing happening, other than widespread panic, that required this or that special pharmaceutical intervention.
Better yet, debunk it as in . . . your study was debunked for bias, low sample size, and a host of other factors.
We are in the year 2025. It would go back to 2015 for 10 years. Hmmm, wonder why Fauci would request it going back to 2014...
